U.N. Mediator Doesn't Expect 'Substantive' Result at Syria Talks Round

إقرأ هذا الخبر بالعربية W460

The ice is slowly breaking in peace talks between Syria's warring sides, U.N. mediator Lakhdar Brahimi said Wednesday, warning though that no substantive results were expected during this round.

"The ice is breaking, slowly, but it is breaking," Brahimi told reporters after a fifth day of talks in Geneva, which both sides described as "positive."

He acknowledged he did not expect "anything substantive" to come out of the initial round, which is set to conclude Friday.

But he stressed that simply getting the parties talking for the first time since the conflict erupted in March 2011 was an important step forward.

"These people have not sat together for three years. They do not expect that there'll be a magic wand," Brahimi said, insisting he was "not disappointed."

The delegations from President Bashar Assad's regime and the opposition National Coalition are set to determine Friday when they will return to Geneva, likely after a week, Brahimi said.

"I hope that the second session will be more structured and hopefully more productive than the first session," he said.

Opposition delegation spokesman Louay Safi told reporters the future talks would need to show "substantial progress."

"We're not going to stay here month after month just talking without progress," he said.

Yet after days of total deadlock, both sides voiced a grain of optimism Wednesday, saying the talks had been "positive."

The discussions had finally focused on the Geneva I communique -- the never-implemented roadmap to peace put out by global powers during talks here in 2012 -- but the two sides disagree sharply on what part of the text the talks should focus on.

"Today we had a positive step forward because for the first time now we are talking about the transitional governing body," Safi said.

The opposition says creating the transitional government called for in the Geneva I communique must be the first step towards a political solution, and insists this will require Assad to leave power.

The regime denies the text requires Assad to step down and says his role is not up for debate at this conference.

Regime delegation member Buthaina Shaaban also said talks Wednesday had been "positive", but said this was "because they spoke about (fighting) terrorism."

She stressed that the first item in the Geneva text was related to ending the violence in Syria, something the regime largely equates to rooting out the "terrorism" it claims the opposition and its foreign backers are supporting.

"We want to discuss Geneva I item by item, starting from the first item," she said, accusing the opposition of focusing on the transitional government in a bid to grab power.

The two sides have been brought together in Geneva in the biggest diplomatic push yet to end a civil war that has left more than 130,000 dead and forced millions from their homes.

Brahimi stressed Wednesday that "the gap between them is quite large," calling on Washington and Moscow, which instigated the talks, to "use their influence with the parties."

"They are using their capacity to convince, which is more than my capacity to convince," he said.

The opposition is also planning to soon meet with Russian officials in Moscow, spokeswoman Rafif Jouejati told Agence France Presse, maintaining there had been "an easing in the Russian position on Syria."

No progress was meanwhile apparent towards fulfilling the only tangible promise of the Geneva talks so far: Brahimi's announcement Sunday the regime had agreed to allow women and children safe passage from besieged rebel-held areas of Homs.

The Old City of Homs has been under siege since June 2012 after rebels there rose against the regime, with an estimated 3,000 people living with near-daily shelling and the barest of supplies.

U.N. bodies and the International Committee of the Red Cross have said they are on standby with aid but are waiting for approval to move in.

Syrian government forces meanwhile dropped barrel bombs on rebel-held districts of Aleppo, killing 13 people, the Syrian Observatory for Human Rights said.

It took months of pressure from Washington, which backs the opposition, and Moscow, Assad's key international ally and arms supplier, to bring the two sides together.

Their efforts also secured a landmark deal last year to remove and destroy Syria's chemical arsenal.

Sources close to the world's chemical watchdog however said Wednesday that less than five percent of the around 700 tonnes of chemicals that were supposed to have left Syria by December 31 last year have done so.

And in yet another reminder of the urgency of bringing Syria's bloody civil war to an end, U.S. intelligence said Wednesday that Damascus may now be capable of producing biological weapons.

Comments 20
Thumb jcamerican 29 January 2014, 15:19

So far so good.

Thumb _mowaten_ 29 January 2014, 16:08

meh.. at this stage nothing less than the total extermination of takfiris and other saudi mercenaries is acceptable.

Thumb chrisrushlau 29 January 2014, 16:49

The communique does not mention Assad by name or by office. It does not call for his removal. It speaks vaguely of the need for change. Discussing it obliges nobody. Indeed, as things go from bad to worse for the "insurgents" (mercenaries), they and their backers are the ones who evidently need some "transition".

Thumb Mazen 29 January 2014, 19:02

Learn to love your extremist foreign Islamist mercenaries

http://www.nytimes.com/2006/11/15/world/middleeast/15nations.html?_r=0

Thumb HushTag 29 January 2014, 15:32

"To jaw-jaw is always better than to war-war." - Winston Churchill

Thumb _mowaten_ 29 January 2014, 16:08

that didnt prevent the RAF from wiping out many german cities...

Thumb HushTag 29 January 2014, 17:42

If I'm not mistaken the RAF bombings happened during war-war.

Thumb beiruti 29 January 2014, 15:33

progress indeed

Thumb Mystic 29 January 2014, 15:58

Yes progress, aslong as the opposition and it's allies, does not layout preconditions to the government, such as for the President to step down.

If they wanted him to step down, he would've done it 3 years ago now is not the time to step down, we need a democratic vote in Syria and respect what the people of Syria wants.

Thumb jabal10452 29 January 2014, 16:55

Mystic: the key words are "democratic vote", as you put it. By that we should mean truly democratic elections, not the Baath flavor of elections where 99,99% of the votes go for Bashar. If they could agree on a mechanism for implementing a somewhat transparent election, then Syria would be on the right track, even if it means that less savory parties win (including the Baath which I loath).

Thumb Mystic 29 January 2014, 20:09

The majority of the Syrian people were with Mr. Assad and still is. It is because of the foreign backed militias that there is this sick war going on. The normal Syrian people just wants their country to breath without western/Saudi backed insurgents.

Missing peace 29 January 2014, 21:23

sure like millions of libyans supported khaddafi....

Thumb jabal10452 29 January 2014, 22:42

Mystic, there is only one way to know if the majority of the Syrian people are with Assad, as you claim, and it is through free elections. If the result of such free and fair elections are in Assad's favor, the first one who will eat his words and congratulate the winner is myself.

Thumb Mystic 29 January 2014, 22:52

Yes it should be a free democratic election jabal, we agree then.

Thumb Mystic 29 January 2014, 22:59

But only the Syrian people can decide that, with no western or foreign interference.

Thumb ToniFarris 30 January 2014, 06:11

He means whats left of the Syrian people can decide. lol

Thumb lebpatriot246 29 January 2014, 18:21

No, but keep dreaming...

Thumb Mystic 29 January 2014, 20:49

You still here Mr. American a7la w sa7la, how is it going with the funding of takfiris?

Thumb cedars2 29 January 2014, 22:10

No one told Assad to go shooting unarmed sunni demonstrators 3 years ago when all this started. He dragged the army into this. The soldier that refused to fire on the unarmed crowds recieved a bullet to the head. Thats why so many deserted and went to the other side.Violence breeds violence. Now Assad can reap the rewards of that violence. Bashar is nothing like Hafez (both killers sure) but this one is a very emotional mommy's boy, if someone dosent go along with his plans he uses violence not thinking of the consequences. Do

Thumb cedars2 29 January 2014, 22:10

you think if Hafez were alive he wouldve issued the order to assasinate Harriri? Not in a million years. No this specimen is a typical arrogant Syrian who thinks hes bigger than he actually is. He will fall eventually but on the ruins of Syria. He could have given them a few pathetic rights at the start and avoided all this (the right to breathe, the right to think) but no he wants it all. He destroyed the Syrian army and Syria for that matter.
As for your interference in Syria rememeber what goes around comes around ie suicide bombers and the shiite community living in fear all the time.