Security Council Condemns Syria Crackdown on Protests as Tanks Storm Hama

إقرأ هذا الخبر بالعربية W460

The United Nations condemned on Wednesday the Syrian government's deadly crackdown on protests and called for those responsible to be held "accountable," as tanks stormed the protest hub of Hama.

A Security Council statement agreed after weeks of often-acrimonious talks said the body "condemns the widespread violations of human rights and the use of force against civilians by the Syrian authorities."

But it also urged “all sides to act with utmost restraint, and to refrain from reprisals, including attacks against state institutions.”

"The Security Council calls on the Syrian authorities to fully respect human rights and to comply with their obligations under applicable international law. Those responsible for the violence should be held accountable," the text read.

The council also called on Syrian authorities to "cooperate fully" with the U.N. High Commissioner for Human Rights.

The statement also highlights President Bashar al-Assad's reform promises. The members regret "the lack of progress in implementation, and call upon the Syrian government to implement their commitments."

Lebanon disavowed the statement, saying it would "not help" end the Syrian crisis.

At the same time, the United States hardened its line on Bashar al-Assad, with White House spokesman Jay Carney saying Washington had no interest in seeing the Syrian president survive just to preserve regional "stability."

As the diplomatic wrangling drew to a conclusion, Syrian tanks had stormed the city of Hama, activists said.

"There are some 100 tanks and troop carriers on the highway leading to the central city of Hama and about 200 tanks around the eastern city of Deir Ezzor," said Britain-based Syrian Observatory for Human Rights chief Rami Abdul Rahman.

Telephone and Internet communication were cut in Hama and nearby areas, he told Agence France Presse.

Abdul Raman also reported that a local official in Deir Ezzor "received advice from well-informed sources that residents should flee while they still had time before the army storms the town by Friday."

In Hama, tanks were deployed in several districts and shelling could be heard across many neighborhoods, another activist told AFP.

"From the sound of the shelling, it sounds like it's open warfare."

The Local Coordination Committees, which represents the protesters, said plumes of smoke could be seen over the city of 800,000 residents.

"People are deserting the city and are faced by live gunfire from security forces and army troops if they don't respond to orders to go back inside," a statement said.

The accounts could not be independently verified as foreign reporters are not allowed to travel in Syria to report on the unrest.

The fierce crackdown on Hama, where an estimated 20,000 people were killed in 1982 when Assad's father Hafez crushed an Islamist uprising, has prompted solidarity protests across Syria and international condemnation.

In other developments, a mosque official said between 800 and 1,000 persons demonstrated after prayers in the northwestern city of Latakia and were dispersed by police with batons. Thirty people were said to have arrested.

The Security Council had been struggling since Monday over how to respond to the crisis, with European powers and the United States seeking a tough condemnation.

Russia, China and some other nations initially blocked any action, saying it could lead to a Libya-style military intervention by the West.

But on Wednesday, ambassadors agreed to a text that would condemn Syria, diplomats said.

Following those changes, Russia lifted its objections, with U.N. envoy Vitaly Churkin calling the new version "balanced."

It was the council's first pronouncement on Syria since protests started on March 15.

The statement dropped references to a human rights inquiry that Britain, France, Germany and Portugal had called for in their earlier versions of the text.

But it said those responsible for the violence would be held "accountable."

U.N. Secretary General Ban Ki-moon had joined the fray earlier this week, saying the Syrian president "lost all sense of humanity."

At the White House, meanwhile, Carney said Washington did not view Assad as "indispensible," saying he was completely "incapable and unwilling" to respond to the grievances of his own people.

"The U.S. has nothing invested in Assad remaining in power. We do not want to see him to remain in Syria for stability's sake and rather we view him as the cause for instability in Syria," Carney said.

Some analysts have speculated that Washington was wary of directly calling for Assad to quit because of anxiety that security chaos, even civil war, and a Middle East power vacuum might follow the demise of his regime.

Global condemnation of the crackdown mounted after weekend violence in which an estimated 140 people were killed in a military assault on Hama and other protest towns.

Meanwhile funerals were held on Wednesday for seven members of the security services and army who were killed by "armed terrorist gangs" in a suburb of Damascus as well as in Homs, Hama and Daraa, state-run news agency SANA said.

State television also aired an amateur video showing corpses being thrown from a bridge into a river, and said the bodies were of security forces killed by protesters. But activists challenged that account, saying the victims were pro-democracy protesters killed by the army.

According to the Syrian Observatory 1,629 civilians and 374 members of the security forces have been killed since pro-democracy protests erupted in Syria on March 15.

On the domestic front SANA said parliament would meet in an extraordinary session on Sunday to discuss "issues concerning the nation and its citizens." It did not elaborate.

Comments 10
Default-user-icon Aldahshan (Guest) 03 August 2011, 20:51

Where was the world when Israel killed 1600 Lebanese civilians in 2006 and 800 Palestinians in Gaza in 2007 and tens of thousands of children in the west bank over the years. Where were they when the refugee camps in Lebanon were being bombarded regularly since 1967. Where were they when the USA leveled Ramadi in Iraq in 2004. How come they are silent on Yemen, Bahrain, Jordan etc etc where they are rampant on Gaddafi and Assad. These guys are not angels but if the world has to be fair and Democratic then they should treat them that way. There is a revolt against their system whatever that system may be and armed people are killing their soldiers . They have the right to defend their country.By what right did Europe arm and supply what they themselves call rebels in Libya. That means every country has the right to supply and arm rebels in any other country including Iran's support to Hezbollah and Russia to Break-away Georgian province and the Bask region of Spain etc.Enough is enou

Default-user-icon Baltageya + Shabbiha = Hezbullah (Guest) 03 August 2011, 23:18

Aldahshan... get a life! :)

Default-user-icon The Truth (Guest) 03 August 2011, 23:45

@Aldahshan: The soldiers are massacring the people not defending themselves, like all dictatorships, this one is committing genocide on its own people to stay in power, the revolution is trying to bring democracy to Syria just like the Cedar revolution did in Lebanon.

Default-user-icon @Aldahshan (Guest) 03 August 2011, 23:48

The UN has condemned the violence in Egypt, Bahrain and Yemen, look it up they condemned all those pro american dictatorships too.

Default-user-icon major (Guest) 04 August 2011, 00:43

Where was the world when the Syrian army was killing hundreds of residents of Achrafieh in 1978. And where was the world when the Syrian army was slaughtering hundreds of civilians in Zahle in 1981. And where was the world when the Syrian army was executing surrendering lebanese army soldiers in 1990... I see a pastern don't you, but I guess better late than never. Still some pretend Lebanese feel compelled to voice their disapproval at the international community acting against that murderous regime for once, those are the Lebanese version of the Shabbiha who used their sharpened knives to finish off up close and personal the people the Syrian army's tanks and gun didn't. You will recognize those Shabbiha as they will be posting here.

Default-user-icon Hezballah - Baltageya = Shabbiha (Guest) 04 August 2011, 00:45

If Europe and the west are so bad according to Al-Mumane3 Aoun... why did he run away like a coward to France? Why didnt he run away to some Mumana3a country... Iran for example :) Gharib hay zalami... :) I wasted my youth supporting him...

Missing toivas 04 August 2011, 01:20

The end of the Assaad rule and all the small warlords in Lebanon like HB, GMA POP 84, SSNP, BAATH, AMAL... is coming to an end soon. Allah yirhamoun

Default-user-icon LadyGaGa (Guest) 04 August 2011, 04:11

@ALDASHAN: I hear you loud and clear BUT HAFEZ AL ASSAD was not Innocent in HAMAH, ARAFAT and his armed gangsters were not innocent when they used to hid in the Refugee Camps after committing crimes/robbery in the streets of Lebanon (Only Country that welcomed them), SADDAM was not innocent in Iraq, Qaddafi is not innocent and so on.

Thumb ithinktherel4iam 04 August 2011, 04:40

What a lousy report by Naharnet! And worse than that is their grammar!

Thumb bipartisan 04 August 2011, 10:42

to sum up, Syria says that the world turns a blink eye to Israel, and israel says that the world has double standards regarding palestine. In reality, both are murderers, Syrian and Israeli governments are murderers and both have committed atrocities. but the problem is not in there nature but in the parties that oppose them. Aarafat with no doubts was an opportunist, Abbas a dictator King Abdallah, a monarch in lebanon sectarian mafia pluralism it their opposition that kept those people in place, and to mention, nothing scared Israel more than the oust of Moubarack and nothing relieved them more than the rise of the military in Egypt, face it the revolution there has been hijacked. But the worst thing is that since those government are using repression against dissent the latter are taking refuge in temples and mosques which is increasing sectarianism. hope on the long run liberty of religion will take from there rather than self induced fanatic behaviour