Obama Seeks to Allay Saudi Fears on Iran, Syria

إقرأ هذا الخبر بالعربية W460

U.S. President Barack Obama sought Friday to allay Riyadh's criticism of his policies on Syria and Iran, telling the Saudi king their two countries remain in lockstep on strategic interests.

He also assured King Abdullah that the U.S. "won't accept a bad deal" with Iran, as global powers negotiate a treaty reining in Tehran's controversial nuclear program.

Obama arrived from Italy to meet for some two hours with the monarch of the oil-rich kingdom on a royal estate outside Riyadh on the last leg of a six-day tour.

The U.S. president told the king that "he believes that our strategic interests remain very much aligned" with those of Saudi Arabia, a senior U.S. administration official told reporters.

Earlier, White House officials said discussions would focus on ways to "empower" Syria's moderate opposition.

"One of the main topics of conversation" would be "how do we best empower the moderate opposition inside of Syria politically, militarily as a counterweight to (President Bashar) Assad," deputy national security adviser Ben Rhodes told reporters on board Air Force One.

Rhodes also said U.S.-Saudi ties have been improving thanks to cooperation on ways to support Syria's opposition.

"Our relationship with the Saudis is in a stronger place today than it was in the fall (autumn) when we had some tactical differences about our Syria policy," he said.

Saudi Arabia was dismayed by Obama's 11th-hour decision last year not to carry out military strikes against the Syrian regime over chemical weapons attacks.

But officials shot down as untrue reports that the U.S. administration was planning to give Riyadh a green light to ship heavy weapons, known as MANPADs, to the beleaguered moderate Syrian opposition.

"We have not changed our position on providing MANPADS to the opposition," a second senior administration official said, acknowledging "this is a proliferation risk".

"This wasn't a focus of the meeting," he insisted.

Riyadh also has strong reservations about revived efforts by Washington and other major world powers to negotiate with Iran.

Sunni Muslim Saudi Arabia, long wary of Shiite Iran's regional ambitions, views a November deal between world powers and Iran on its nuclear program as a risky venture that could embolden Tehran.

The interim agreement curbs Iran's controversial nuclear activities in exchange for limited sanctions relief, and is aimed at buying time to negotiate a comprehensive accord.

Saudi Arabia, the largest power in the six-nation Gulf Cooperation Council, fears that a possible U.S. withdrawal from the Middle East and a diplomatic overture towards Iran would further feed Tehran's regional ambitions.

Iranian-Saudi rivalry crystallized with the Syrian conflict: Tehran backs Assad's regime, while several GCC states support the rebellion.

Obama's stand on events reshaping the region "have strained relations, but without causing a complete break," said Anwar Eshki, head of the Jeddah-based Middle East Center for Strategic and Legal Studies.

U.S. security and energy specialist professor Paul Sullivan said Obama meeting King Abdullah could "help clear the air on some misunderstandings".

"However, I would be quite surprised if there were any major policy changes during this visit. This is also partly a reassurance visit," he added.

The two leaders were also expected to discuss Egypt, another bone of contention since the 2011 uprising that ousted Hosni Mubarak, who was a staunch U.S. and Saudi ally.

The kingdom was angered by the partial freezing of U.S. aid to Egypt after the army toppled Islamist president Mohammed Morsi last July -- a move hailed by Riyadh.

Meanwhile, U.S. officials said Obama did not raise the issue of human rights with the king despite appeals from U.S. lawmakers and rights groups.

Dozens of U.S. lawmakers had urged Obama to publicly address Saudi Arabia's "systematic human rights violations" and efforts by women activists to challenge its ban on female drivers.

"We do have a lot of significant concerns about the human rights situation" in Saudi Arabia, the second administration official said, mentioning in particular "women's freedoms".

Saudi activists have urged women to defy the driving ban and get behind the wheel on Saturday, the second day of Obama's visit.

Comments 12
Thumb ex-fpm 28 March 2014, 17:12

please, provide links to these polls LOL

Missing --karim- 28 March 2014, 17:56

I remember when the US boosted the "moderate opposition" (i.e. the mujahedeen terrorist forces)in Afghanistan in 1979, against the Soviet Union. That "moderate opposition" went on to become Al Qaeda that killed thousands of innocent civilians on 9/11.

The FSA-Al Qaeda jihadist terrorists are the exact same. Same culture. Same ideology. Same love for terrorism. The US government just never learns its lesson.

Missing peace 28 March 2014, 18:33

don't worry bashar lovers of this site... USA will never do anything to try and bring down assad as he is the protector of israel....

till they don't find anyone to replace bashar and continue to protect israel's peace they ll help noone...

so don't panic M8ers! LOL

Default-user-icon hanoun (Guest) 28 March 2014, 19:19

as long as the mou3arada is religious , there is no moderation
the same goes for countries that are religious ie the rule of a holy book (koraan , tora , ...) they are not moderate
moderation =secular

Thumb thelebpatriot111 28 March 2014, 20:10

They should talk about ways the cannibal king can step down and allow democracy in Saudi Arabia.

Missing helicopter 29 March 2014, 01:23

If I got paid $1 for every time you used the word cannibal, I would have been a millionaire. If I were to be paid $1 for every interesting and meaningful posted I would have been the poorest of the poor.

Thumb kanaanljdid 28 March 2014, 22:51

Weak and coward Obama

Missing --karim- 29 March 2014, 00:06

Why would the US want to arm the FSA-Al Qaeda jihadist terrorists when they spent more than 10 years and lost thousands of soldiers while fighting them in Iraq and Afghanistan? The US public is firmly against it.

Thumb cedre 29 March 2014, 00:43

coz they're arming Maliki's sectarian militia that is ruled by ur wali al faqih...

Missing VINCENT 29 March 2014, 00:41

There is one born every day. If true, it is because they are delusional. I heard about a guy who sold the Brooklyn bridge to people brick by brick. When these idiots went to visit the bridge, do you think they found the bricks with their names on it?

Missing helicopter 29 March 2014, 01:21

It is bigjohn, The US got rid of Saddam, made Iran/Syria/HA stronger ..... and as a result made you and M8 happy campers.

Missing --karim- 29 March 2014, 06:58

Back so soon from the Taliban training camps?