Captive Troops' Families Threaten Escalation, Some Accuse Hizbullah of Hindering Negotiations

إقرأ هذا الخبر بالعربية W460

Families of Lebanese troops abducted by Syria-based militants on Sunday threatened to escalate their protests across Lebanon to press for the release of their loves ones, as some of them accused Hizbullah of obstructing negotiations between the Lebanese government and the kidnappers.

“We have been giving negotiations a chance but we haven't sensed any serious efforts,” families of captive troops said in Beirut's Martyrs Square, declaring an end to their “peaceful sit-in” and vowing to step up their moves.

“The slaughter of our sons did not shake the conscience of the officials,” they lamented, referring to the recent executions of the soldiers Ali al-Sayyed, Abbas Medlej and Mohammed Hamiyeh at the hands of Islamic State and al-Nusra Front extremists.

The families warned that “the Lebanese government, whose decision is usurped by Hizbullah, will be responsible for anything that might happen to our sons.”

They accused Hizbullah of obstructing the negotiations while holding talks with al-Nusra to free its own captive fighters.

“Who benefited from firing at the initiative of the Muslim Scholars Committee? Who benefited from firing at the family of the abductee George Khoury (while on its way back from meeting its son in Arsal's outskirts?)” the families asked.

They warned that “the decision to resort to the military solution, which Hizbullah managed to impose on the government, represents the biggest threat to our sons' lives.”

“Pinning the blame on Arsal's residents aims to deviate attention from Hizbullah's acts and we were surprised that some other families did not take part in the sit-in due to Hizbullah's pressures,” the relatives added, referring to the families of the captive troops who hail from the Bekaa.

“We urge al-Nusra Front and the Islamic State to release our sons and we announce the end of the peaceful sit-in in downtown Beirut,” the Beirut protesters said.

“Expect everything from us from now on,” they cautioned.

According to information obtained by Future TV, the families intend to block the vital highway between the North and Beirut “to press the government to exert serious efforts and release Islamist detainees from its prisons."

Earlier on Sunday, families of captive troops who hail from the North staged a sit-in on the Qalamun highway near Tripoli.

They also warned that they might cut off the highway between the North and Beirut indefinitely in addition to a number of roads across all regions.

“Expect everything from us,” the families cautioned.

“We might force the closure of entire Lebanon,” one of them said, addressing Lebanese officials.

The protesters also slammed the MPs who represent their region over their absence from sit-ins and failure to exert “serious” efforts to secure the release of their relatives.

“We want the freedom of our sons and if obstacles are hindering the negotiations, let that be publicly declared,” the protesters said in a statement.

The country witnessed road-blocking protests and sectarian kidnappings in the wake of the abduction of around 35 troops and policemen from the Bekaa border town of Arsal during clashes between the army and Syria-based jihadist militants.

The tensions escalated after the armed groups executed three captive soldiers.

In late August and early September, two soldiers were beheaded by the ruthless Islamic State group. And on Saturday, al-Nusra Front announced that the group killed another soldier.

On Saturday, the government held an emergency security meeting and announced that it “stands united by the army in its open war against terrorists and rejects blackmail in the case of abducted soldiers.”

“The threats of executing the soldiers by the terrorists are the main reasons that hindered the negotiation efforts to release the captives,” the government said.

It gave instructions to the chiefs of the army and security forces to “take all conducive measures to apply military plans," calling for "zero tolerance with everything that threatens the integrity of Lebanon, the region of Arsal and its outskirts."

Y.R.

Comments 19
Thumb lebnanfirst 21 September 2014, 19:31

Our hearts go out to the families. Indeed as the saying goes يلّي عّم يأكل العصي مش متل يلّي عّم يعدّها.
Threatening to shut down parts, or all of the country, is not the answer however.

Thumb cityboy 21 September 2014, 19:45

you are right, of course shutting down the country is not the answer but somehow, i hardly think that was the real intent of the families of the soliders. Perhaps one or two of the relatives might have said something of that sort out of frustration and it seems naharnet spin masters turn that into a news story with a dramatic headline instead of telling us about what the families are going through after so many weeks with no solution to the abductions.

Thumb lebnanfirst 21 September 2014, 20:18

@cityboy
Thank you, we are on the same page there.
Unfortunately, I do not believe that either ISIS or Al-Nusra will live up to any agreement and will keep changing their demands. Those entities have no honor.
If the army has the armament and capabilities to take these thugs out, maybe even with the help of US air power, then I'm all for it even at the expense of risking the lives of our courageous LAF soldiers. Would you agree?

Default-user-icon guy in green (Guest) 22 September 2014, 10:36

If ozzy cityboy lived in lebanon or followed lebanese media other than almanar or otv he wouldn't posting nonsense nor dismiss the families' blame of hezballah they are all over the news channels doing this in person.

Thumb _mowaten_ 22 September 2014, 11:37

sounds like da3esh threatened the families into saying this. we know they have intermediaries they use to transfer messages.
the most likely explanation is that these statements were communicated to them and with orders to repeat them "or else..."

Thumb ex-fpm 22 September 2014, 11:55

sounds like your propaganda and arrogance have no limits

Thumb lubnani.masi7i 21 September 2014, 20:19

They accused Hizbullah of obstructing the negotiations while holding talks with al-Nusra to free its own captive fighters.

HA is indeed obstructing the negotiations while it negotiates with Nusra and ISIL for its own hostages. HA wants the LAF to go into an unknown battle with ISIL thus making its HA war in Syria legitimate and authorized. HA is a cancerous tumor.

Thumb galaxy 21 September 2014, 20:27

Southern, why are the families of the shia soldiers not joining the peaceful sit-in in downtown beirut? Or they prefer to kidnap sunni civilians from Arsal?

Thumb lebnanfirst 21 September 2014, 21:12

@galaxy
I think most of us can appreciate the jest of your first questions and it's legitimacy @_Southern_.'s response notwithstanding.
What was the point of your second question other than it's blatant sectarian insinuation, even though the abductions you allude to did take place?

Thumb galaxy 21 September 2014, 21:51

calling things as they are is sectarian? Keep burying your head in the sand. You acknowledge these abductions did take place and were based on sectarian reasons. So what is your point? Nothing

Thumb lebnanfirst 21 September 2014, 22:14

My point is, had the shoe been on the other foot, I would expect no difference. Contrary to what you may think, my head is anything but buried in the sand. Berate HA as much as you want and so will I, but comments such as that serve no useful purpose.

Thumb liberty 22 September 2014, 07:11

read idiot and you will get the answer

Thumb canadianpaul 21 September 2014, 20:36

The country is on the verge of exploding into a sectarian war, while Hizbullah is playing footsie with ISIS. They pay lip service to supporting the army, then backstab the same people who are protecting their flank. Filthy Iranians!

Missing helicopter 21 September 2014, 21:43

Southern, glad you stated " .... the families are right ....)
Here is what the families said:
They accused Hizbullah of obstructing the negotiations while holding talks with al-Nusra to free its own captive fighters.

HA can butt out of Syria, butt out of dictating to the Government if and how to negotiate the freeing of the soldiers, or HA can offer to exchange the soldiers for its own fighters. After all this would give a sure sign that they care about the country and about the soldiers.

Thumb fadi_albeiruti 22 September 2014, 02:22

very well put terrorist.

Thumb Elemental 22 September 2014, 05:30

Lebanon was always secondary to HA, always will be. Iran first of course.

Missing panzergen 22 September 2014, 07:45

Now who abducted these noble Lebanese army personnel? Was it Nusra Front or HA?

Missing panzergen 22 September 2014, 07:46

Who beheads some of these Lebanese soldiers? Terrorist or HA?

Default-user-icon eh? (Guest) 22 September 2014, 19:09

FT, who drove a tank over captive Lebanese soldiers? Terrorist or Syrian Army?