"توافق" في لجنة البيان الوزاري على موضوع اللاجئين و8 آذار تصر على "الشعب والجيش والمقاومة"
Read this story in English
توافق الوزراء المكلفون صياغة البيان الوزاري للحكومة الجديدة على إيجاد حل لأزمة اللاجئين السوريين إلى لبنان، في حين أصر وزراء الثامن من آذار على ثلاثية "الشعب والجيش والمقاومة".
وأفادت قناة "الجديد" أنه "جرى التوافق على ملف اللاجئين السوريين".
إلا أن قناتي الـ"LBCI" و"المستقبل" أشارتا إلى أن "حزب الله" متمسك بثلاثية الجيش والشعب والمقاومة".
وتم بحث هذا البند بالفعل مساء الخميس ولم يتخذ القرار النهائي بشأنه.
وفي بيان صادر عن المجتمعين أفيد أنه "تم البحث في عدد من المواضيع على ان تجتمع اللجنة مجددا عند الخامسة من مساء يوم غد الجمعة في السراي الكبير".
وأعلن وزير العمل سجعان قزي بعد انتهاء الجلسة قائلا "لا لثلاثية الجيش والشعب والمقاومة ولا مبررات لها والظروف تغيرت".
وكان قد قال وزير الإتصالات بطرس حرب من السرايا قبيل دخول الجلسة "نرفض "الثلاثية" وكلمة مقاومة شأن آخر ونتمسك بسياسة النأي بالنفس".
من جهته توقع وزير المالية علي حسن خليل "ان يكون هناك جلسة او اثنتان للانتهاء من صياغة البيان الوزاري" مشيرا قبل دخول الجلسة إلى أنه "لا عقد حتى الآن".
يشار الى ان اللجنة الوزارية التي تشكلت الثلاثاء في أول جلسة للحكومة اجتمعت الأربعاء في السراي برئاسة سلام الذي أعلن أن البيان الوزاري سيكون "مختلطا ومقتضبا يركز على الاولويات الى حين انتخاب رئيس جديد للجمهورية".

that's why it's useless to discuss/deal with HA/Iran, all they know is force...

Who would like to hear what FT mowaten southern and mystic have to say? ...

Hammouds: All countries have the inherent right to resist against aggressors. Having said the decision of a Nation before she commits its army and resources to resist against a specific threat must be voted on and authorized by the Commander in Chief, General of the Army, Parliament, or whoever is constitutionally handed the the authority to decide. If we are to believe and accept that the Shiite population is self empowered to resist against Israel, O.K. then who should make the decision to also get involved in Syria? Under which approved national defense strategy, declaration of law, or other means is H.A. allowed to engage in a war with a neighboring country?
Can some give me a serious answer to my question. What is it that Hezbollah is resisting?

Come on man, we all know the answer to that. They are resisting progress, and keeping the rest of us down. If Lebanon were partitioned today, HezbollahLand would become a destitute place while the rest of Lebanon would prosper.
I hear what your saying, but I genuinely would like to know what there is to resist, why does Lebanon have a 'Resistance'? Can anyone give me a proper rational (seriously) on why Lebanon has this resistance today?

I am afraid that the underlying reason to arm the Shiites in the South with the collaboration of the Persians and the Syrians is much more cynical than they advertise. I am suspecting of a Plan to forge a beltway consisting of Iraqi Shiites, Syrian Shiites/Alawites and Lebanese Shiites which would inevitably divide our South from Lebanese territories. I hope I am wrong.

Everyone knows that Hezbollah reports to Iran. Even if we ignore everything else, this in itself is an act of treason.
The Lebanese people are sick of this crap. If Hezbollah and its supporters want to remain in a state of war and fear and in a culture of "resistance", then that is their choice but they have no right to force it on others. Either accept the logic of one state, one army or please Partition. Most Lebanese just want to get on with their lives and improve the economy. Enough wars and deaths and above all false causes.

I would rather see the likes of you kicked out, than seing my country burn because of your kind.