كاغ تعلق على كلام عون: 1701 مهم لاستقرار لبنان ويقول لا للسلاح خارج الدولة
Read this story in English
ذكَّرت ممثلة الامين العام للامم المتحدة في لبنان سيغريد كاغ بأهمية قرار 1701 الذي يدعو الى نزع سلاح كل الجماعات المسلحة، مشددة على أنه ضروري لاستقرار لبنان.
ونشرت كاغ تغريدة على "تويتر" قالت فيها "قرار مجلس الامن 17011 واضح وضروري لامن واستقرار لبنان، ويدعو الى نزع سلاح كل الجماعات المسلحة، وانه لا للسلاح خارج الدولة".
وتاتي تغريدة كاغ تعليقا على الكلام الذي صدر عن رئيس الجمهورية ميشال عون في حديث الى قناة cbc المصرية الذي أعلن فيه "سلاح حزب الله ليس مناقضا للدولة، مشددا على أن عدم توجه سلاح الحزب الى الداخل "هو أكثر من مضمون".
وقال "طالما هناك ارض محتلة من اسرائيل وطالما الجيش ليس قويا كفاية ليحارب اسرائيل فنحن نشعر بضرورة وجود سلاح المقاومة ليكمل سلاح الجيش".
وأوضح ان "حزب الله" هم سكان الجنوب وهم من اللبنانيين الذين احتلت ارضهم ولا تزال قسم من الارض محتلة"، مضيفا "وبالتأكيد سلاح حزب الله ليس مناقضا للدولة وهو جزء أساسي من الدفاع عن لبنان".
وأردف "لدينا أرض محتلة من اسرائيل وهي عندما تضع يدها على ارض من الصعب ان ينتزع منها، من هنا يجب النظر الى سلاح حزب الله".
“UN resolution 1701 is vital for Lebanon's stability and security. The resolution calls for disarmament of all armed groups. No arms outside control of state,” said Kaag in a tweet on Monday.
Thank you for educating our president.
she is not in a position to educate anyone, and less our president, the president of all Lebanese, rather she needs education.... shame on you!
UN Special Coordinator for Lebanon Sigird Kaag needs to be educated by Southern.... on what UN Resolution 1701 means.
How can Kaag decide what armaments are in the states control?
The President of Lebanon says the opposite.
What the President said is simple, that whomever attacks Lebanon will have to face an Army and Resistance.
And for recognizing that Hezbullah, as the voice of the Shia majority, is the legitimate armed force of Lebanon, serving valorously in that role in its assistance to Syria against the GCC/NATO-sponsored Takfiri insurgency now and when it expelled Israeli invaders from Lebanon in 2006
Lebanon is not a sect, its a country.
The day you stop speaking in sects is the day it might move forward.
"when it expelled Israeli invaders from Lebanon in 2006"
Check again. At the end of the 33 day war in 2006, the Israelis were inside Lebanon on the banks of the Litani River. It was the UN resolution 1701 that Lebanon agreed to that called for Israeli withdrawal and for " No arms outside control of state".
Mrs. Kaag with due respect, the resistance is not an armed group! take note and don't make ridiculous of yourself... because you're forcing us to educate you.
in a sectarian country where the army is a hostage to that sectarian division, there is no chance to depend only on the LAF untill the political / sectarian / division is solved... just follow the govt disputes concerning how to provide weapons to the army which never happen...
so, what you mean is that the LAF would be able to drive the Israelis and the state would do all what's in its hand to do so!!?... false. btw, the Israeli lobby wouldn't allow that to happen, arming properly with heavy weapons....Iran is the only country that can do that but the govt refused to do so. .. sectarian fear.
when a gap is left uncovered, someone has to fill the gap or placing a cover.... the south was a free zone for the zionists since Palestine's occupation, the LAF due to its limited capacity and the disinterest of the state by what was going on durring the 50/60/70 and the occupation, drove the eruption of the resistance.... there is no guarantee that the Israel would remain quiet.. if the resistance hands its weapons... or is under the army control, since the army depends on political decisions.
regarding the arming the LAF through neutral countries, you need money, too much money for that, because we are not talking about guns and rifles but heavy weapons incluiding anti air defence systems.. till that to happen, we may have time to discuss the situation again..
who knows!
i'm stating facts and realities... if they convince you or not it's a different question... btw, yours are easy words.
i wonder why M8 people always evade the question of hezbollah being under state's control?
they all say the army is weak yet they do not want it to be reinforced by hezbollah's expertise and weaponry...
so:
- is it because they do not want hezbollah to be under the state's control thus meaning they do not want a state controlling every party?
- is it because they want only one sect to rule lebanon and not a state?
- is it because they agree that hezbollah pledged allegiance to iran, are armed by iran, financed by iran thus they agree to be under iran's thumb?
but i believe i will never have any answers as M8 always deviate the question...
why can't hezbollah be under the army's command? simple question no?
Lebanon's response should be that it accepts responsibility for Hezz's actions, unlike in 2006 when Lebanon claimed it was not responsible for what Hezz was doing.
Mr. blablablabla has earned my respect for providing a smooth and cohesive analysis to the matter.
(بين عون "سلاح حزب الله خطر" وعون "سلاح الحزب ضروري"... (فيديو
عون 2005: "سلاح حزب الله لم يعالج بعد"
"ان مجرد وجود السلاح في المجتمع اذا ما كان لديك نزعة للسيطرة عليه، يوحي للناس بالخضوع. وهذا هو المجتمع اللبناني. السيطرة على المجتمع من خلال تواجد السلاح مع فئة معينة نتيجة طبيعية وليست نتيجة تتعلق بارادتك ان لم تستخدمه، بل ستكون محوراً سلطوياً شئت ام أبيت، وهذا ما يعيق الحرية المطلقة للناس التي نريد ان نمارسها بالتوازي والتساوي في مختلف المناطق اللبنانية". بهذه العبارة اختصر عون موقفه من "حزب الله" في حديثٍ تلفزيوني لصالح برنامج "العين الثالثة" عام 2004.
http://www.annahar.com/article/538994-بين-عون-سلاح-حزب-الله-خطر-وعون-سلاح-الحزب-ضروري-12-سنة-فيديو


