Western Intelligence Talking to Damascus
إقرأ هذا الخبر بالعربية
Western intelligence officials have visited Syria to discuss security cooperation with the regime, its deputy foreign minister told the BBC as the West worries about Islamist extremists among the Syrian opposition.
Syrian Deputy Foreign Minister Faisal Mekdad told the BBC that the visits to Damascus pointed to a "schism" between what Western politicians were saying about President Bashar Assad's regime and what Western security services were doing in practice.
Separately the Wall Street Journal newspaper reported that British, German, French and Spanish agencies have been speaking to Assad regime officials since mid-2013.
Western governments have backed the opposition fighting to topple Assad but are increasingly concerned about the influence jihadist groups are wielding in Syria's nearly three-year-old civil war.
They are also worried about fighters from their countries traveling to Syria to join Islamist militants.
Mekdad said Western agencies were asking for security cooperation.
"I would not specify but many of them have visited Damascus, yes," Mekdad said in a broadcast aired Tuesday night.
"When these countries ask for security cooperation, then it seems to me there is a schism between the political and security leadership.
"Many of these countries have contacted us to coordinate security measures."
Last month the United States and Britain suspended their non-lethal aid to the opposition, fearing the growing influence of radical Islamists in the conflict.
Britain's Foreign Office refused to comment on what Mekdad said, saying it does not comment on intelligence matters.
Citing informed sources, the BBC said the U.S., British and German intelligence agencies were among those which had sent officials to Damascus.
The Wall Street Journal, citing diplomats and officials, said a retired officer from Britain's MI6 foreign intelligence agency was the first to visit, in the middle of 2013.
German, French and Spanish agencies have been speaking to regime officials since November, the U.S. daily said.
The newspaper said the talks were narrowly focused on extremists and on Al-Qaida's growing strength in Syria and did not represent a broader diplomatic opening.
AFP reported in November that Western intelligence services had been making contact with Syrian counterparts to test old ties.
Britain and France sent agents to meet the powerful Syrian secret service chief, General Ali Mamluk, whose name figures on a European Union blacklist banning contact.
They were told Syria was ready to resume cooperation but not while the countries' embassies remain closed, sources said.
French President Francois Hollande said Tuesday that 700 people had left France to join the fighting in Syria, while British Foreign Secretary William Hague said on Monday that hundreds of Britons had also gone to Syria to fight.
That has raised fears that foreign veterans of the conflict could pose a heightened security threat at home upon return.
Shiraz Maher, a senior research fellow at the International Center for the Study of Radicalization at King's College London university, said they estimate that between 200 and 366 British nationals have gone to Syria to participate in the conflict.
"We do think it's a growing problem," he told BBC radio on Wednesday.
But he said the "overwhelming majority" of foreign jihadists in Syria "express no desire to return".
"Indeed, a number of those we have been speaking to have died," he said.
The center estimates that only 30 to 50 fighters have returned to Britain.
He said it was "fairly obvious to be able to identify networks of people who are going over to Turkey in the first instance before crossing the border".

Well the hand writing is on the wall. Having created chaos in MENA NATO countries are now very worried about the consequences of their terrorism at home ...
This is why Assad will most likely survive. The West can not afford to have Caliphates all over MENA with training camps training western citizens in terrorist tactics.
And the West is not alone ... China, Russia and many other countries have real trouble coming if MENA becomes a lawless region. Unlike Pakistan and Afghanistan many of these countries offer easy travel to and from.

Yes, it could be all of that, or, these intelligence agencies are working with the Assad regime because they were with him all along. The so-called jihadists weren't there in the beginning when it was peaceful protesters massacred, yet the tomahawk missiles never rained down like they did in Libya. Even the article mentions the nonlethal aid was cut. The policy with Syria was different all along, indicating the west was with Assad all along, but that doesn't suit your takfiri-Assad-resistance narrative, because you would otherwise have to admit Assad is nothing more than another brutal dictator conveniently supported by the west, largely because he keeps Israel safe.

@ voiceofreason
I find your theory that Assad has always been a western asset, even through these last two years absurd ...
Assad was in their cross hairs but Assad's staying power and the emergence of the Takfiris stopped their plans.
It is well known that Assad is receiving military and humanitarian support from Russia and Iran ... hardly western allies.
The missiles never rained down because first the UK Parliament then the US Congress said no way, not another war!
This latest security development is a direct result of KSA terrorism finance of ISIS and ISIL would lead to Caliphates that would train terrorists en masse.

"There's a sucker born every minute" P. T. Barnum is supposed to have said and Mekdad is counting on that when he spins his yarn to his clowns. He hopes that people forgot that even at the height of the Iraq war, when Bashar was welcoming, hosting, training and then sending all forms of foreign Islamist, Jihadist, Al Qaeda, Takfiri, terrorists into Iraq most Western Intelligence services, including US and Brits, still cooperated with the Syrian regime and dealt with it on the many issues including Al Qaeda and Islamist extremists terrorism and coordinated on security measures. There wasn't a schism between their political and security leaderships then there isn't one know, grasping at straws much Mr Mekdad?