U.N. Says Syria Medical Convoy Seizures an 'Abomination'

A senior U.N. aid official accused the Syrian government on Friday of blockading medical supplies from convoys bound for opposition-held areas and called for a fresh international push to end the conflict.

"Medical supplies are being removed from convoys as part of a strategy to deny the wounded medical care. This is an abomination," John Ging, the U.N. director of Syria aid operations, told reporters in Geneva.

"It's the government of Syria who are either not authorizing the free movement of all the medical supplies that need to move, or whose officials are removing from the convoys the medical supplies that they feel could be used to treat the war wounded. This is wholly and totally unacceptable," he said.

Ging did not single out particular incidents and, while lambasting the government over medical supplies, underlined that hampering aid was a tactic by all involved in the Syrian civil war.

He said it was up to countries with influence over the rival sides to help break the deadlock.

"The government has first responsibility. They claim sovereignty, we deal with them on that basis, that they are in the first instance responsible for ensuring that humanitarian action is facilitated throughout the country," he said.

"We also know, at an operational level, that we need the cooperation of many others, armed groups and different organisations," he added.

With 3.5 million Syrians in areas that aid convoys are able to reach only sporadically, and with over 240,000 stuck in besieged communities, blockades have become a powerful tool.

Ging said that even though 9.6 million Syrians have been affected by the conflict, including nearly three million refugees who have fled to overstretched neighboring countries, the crisis was slipping from the headlines.

"We're becoming numb to the scale and the extent of the brutality of this conflict on ordinary people," he said.

Ging urged Syria's warring sides and the international community to revive stalled peace efforts.

"We have to address those with the responsibility and capacity to end this conflict, enjoin them to the responsibility to do that. So far, all that we've heard are words of condemnation, words of sympathy for the people on the ground," he said.

"The valid question to ask political leaders is how long, how many more people will you accept to be killed before you do something different? Because it's 5,000 a month at the moment, and it's over 150,000 already. Is it 200,000, is it a quarter of a million, is it a million people? What is the trigger for a new action?"