U.S., Iran Lay Ground for Extension of Nuclear Deal Deadline

إقرأ هذا الخبر بالعربية W460

U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry and his Iranian counterpart laid the groundwork Tuesday for the possible extension of a Sunday deadline to strike a historic nuclear deal after intense talks in Vienna.

Both Kerry and Mohammad Javad Zarif said however after two days of one-on-one discussions which failed to yield any major breakthrough that negotiators would still keep trying until the July 20 cut-off.

A Western diplomat said an extension is now "highly probable," and by months not weeks.

"As it's highly improbable that we will finalise in Vienna before the weekend, it is highly probable that there will be a wish to continue to negotiate in the coming months," the diplomat said on condition of anonymity on the sidelines of talks in Vienna.

Just extending "by weeks doesn't make much sense," the envoy said. "It is soon August ... There will have to be a break."

He added that following two days of intensive talks between Kerry and his Iranian counterpart, all focus was now on the terms of the extension.

This could even be agreed before the weekend, he said.

"We hope to have left here before (the weekend)... since we are talking about a rollover."

He added that there had been some progress in the talks, but that on the key issue of uranium enrichment, Iran's position has shifted "very, very, very little."

"We cannot say that things are going in the wrong direction, they are going pretty much in the right direction. But on the biggest and most difficult issue (enrichment), we are still far apart," he said.

After a decade of rising tensions, such an accord between Iran and the five permanent members of the U.N. Security Council plus Germany is aimed to easing concerns that Iran might develop nuclear weapons and silencing talk of war.

"I am returning to Washington today to consult with President (Barack) Obama and with leaders in Congress over the coming days about the prospects for a comprehensive agreement, as well as a path forward if we do not achieve one by the 20th of July, including the question of whether or not more time is warranted, based on the progress we've made and how things are going," Kerry said.

He told a news conference that there had been "tangible progress on key issues, and we had extensive conversations in which we moved on certain things", although "very real gaps" persisted between the two sides.

Zarif, in a separate news conference, said that although he still hopes a deal would be possible by Sunday, he believed enough progress has been made to justify a continuation.

"As we stand now, we have made enough headway to be able to tell our political bosses that this is a process worth continuing," Zarif said. "This is my recommendation. I am sure Secretary Kerry will make the same recommendation."

An interim accord struck in November between Iran and the five permanent members of the U.N. Security Council plus Germany expires on July 20.

Extending the deadline has always been a possibility in order to keep the parties talking, but Washington in particular has stressed it will not agree to such a move without key concessions from Iran first.

Iran denies seeking the atomic bomb and wants the lifting of crippling U.N. and Western sanctions.

The six powers want Iran to dramatically reduce in scope its nuclear program for a lengthy period of time and agree to more intrusive U.N. inspections.

This would greatly expand the time needed for the Islamic republic to develop a nuclear weapon, should it choose to do so, while giving the world ample warning of any such "breakout" push.

Iran on the other hand has stated it wants to expand its nuclear facilities, insisting they are for purely peaceful purposes and that it has the perfect right to nuclear activities under international treaties.

Both sides are also under intense pressure from hardliners at home -- midterm U.S. elections are due in November -- and both are wary of giving too much away after several months of talks.

Kerry, along with the foreign ministers of France, Germany and Britain and the deputy foreign minister of China jetted into the Austrian capital on Sunday seeking to inject some momentum to the negotiations.

But the three European ministers left on Sunday evening empty-handed, leaving Kerry to keep trying.

Britain's now former foreign secretary William Hague had said a "huge gap" remained on the key issue of uranium enrichment.

This activity can produce fuel for the country's sole nuclear plant or, if further enriched, the material for an atomic bomb.

Israel, the Middle East's sole if undeclared nuclear armed state and which together with Washington has refused to rule out military action, is opposed to any enrichment by Iran at all.

Zarif however outlined a possible compromise in an interview with the New York Times published on Tuesday.

This "innovative proposal" would see Iran essentially freeze its enrichment capacities at current levels for between three and seven years.

Kerry stuck to his guns on Tuesday, saying that nothing short of a reduction in Iran's enrichment capacities was acceptable.

"We have made it crystal clear that the 19,000 (centrifuge enrichment machines) that are currently part of their program is too many," Kerry said.

A senior U.S. official said last week the program should be limited for a "double digit" number of years.

Comments 2
Missing VINCENT 16 July 2014, 06:00

Iran has now succeeded deflecting attention from its domestic nuclear program and geopolitical agenda in Iraq. Iran doesn't want peace between the Arabs and the Jews. Iran needs the Arabs busy killing each other to somewhat comfortably achieve its nuclear goals and geopolitical hegemony over the Arabs.

Thumb scorpyonn 16 July 2014, 08:05

Come on John Kerry-- don't be trolled and laughed at. Strike them with a crippling military blow and get it over with.