Israel Razes E.Jerusalem Home in Synagogue Attack Crackdown

إقرأ هذا الخبر بالعربية W460

Israel began a crackdown in east Jerusalem Wednesday, a day after an assault by Palestinians on a synagogue killed five people, razing the home of a resident behind an earlier deadly attack.

The demolition, which took place before dawn, was carried out after Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu promised a harsh response to the synagogue attack which killed four rabbis at prayer and a policeman.

Two Palestinians wielding meat cleavers and a gun ran amok in the rare assault on a place of worship which was the city's bloodiest attack in six years.

It came as Israel struggles to contain a wave of unrest in annexed Arab east Jerusalem that has seen a growing number of deadly attacks by lone Palestinians.

"I have ordered the destruction of the homes of the Palestinians who carried out this massacre and to speed up the demolitions of those who carried out previous attacks," Netanyahu said late on Tuesday.

Several hours later, Israeli forces went to the flashpoint east Jerusalem neighborhood of Silwan and demolished the third-floor apartment of the family of Abdelrahman Shaludi, who deliberately rammed his car into a crowd of pedestrians last month, killing a young woman and a baby.

Shaludi was shot by police as he fled the scene after his October 22 rampage, later dying of his wounds.

Punitive house demolitions have been used by Israel for years in the West Bank but the policy was halted in 2005 after the army said they had no proven deterrent effect.

Until now, razing homes has never been adopted as a matter of policy in annexed Arab east Jerusalem.

The family home in densely populated Silwan was little more than a shell after the demolition, its inner and outer walls blown out and piles of rubble covering the floor, an Agence France Presse correspondent reported.

A falling chunk of concrete hit a car in the street below, crushing it.

The family had moved out ahead of the demolition and were staying with relatives.

"Where can we go now? We have nowhere to live, no home," said Nibras Shaludi, a younger sister of the man behind the attack.

- Controversial practice -

Israel's decision to resume the policy of house demolitions was taken on November 6 following a second attack by a Palestinian using a car which killed two Israelis, an official told AFP.

The aim, he said was "to restore calm in Jerusalem" following a wave of attacks in the city.

But in 2005, the army recommended halting the policy, saying it was not effective as a deterrent and suggesting it was likely to encourage violence.

Human rights groups have denounced the practice as collective punishment targeting not the perpetrators but their families.

And last week, the U.S. State Department warned that demolishing homes would be "counterproductive" and would "exacerbate an already tense situation" in Jerusalem.

Israeli commentators too expressed skepticism.

"The effectiveness of demolishing homes is controversial," wrote Nahum Barnea in the top-selling Yediot Aharonot newspaper.

"The Shin Bet (internal security service) contends that it deters, the army contends that it does not and that it could even have the opposite effect —- it sows the seeds for the next terror attack," he wrote.

"But all that is irrelevant, because the government ... feels that it must show the public that it is punishing the other side."

Amnesty International said home demolitions were illegal under international law and warned Israel not to "trample over the rights of Palestinians ... in order to restore security."

Aside from the homes of the two Palestinians behind the synagogue attack, there are another three east Jerusalem apartments earmarked for demolition in connection with a spate of attacks over the past three months.

Comments 8
Missing phillipo 19 November 2014, 10:30

Perhaps it will be a good thing if the world did recognise a "State of Palestine".
Why? simple.
Palestinians illegally cross an international border and attack civilians inside a foreign country (Israel).
That foreign country (Israel) then retaliates against the country (Palestine) that allowed this to happen. Who can blame Israel for retaliating?

Thumb _mowaten_ 19 November 2014, 10:56

like israel ever refrained from exercising aggression, vengeance and collective punishment on palestinians. trying to make yourself feel better with this cheap justification?

Default-user-icon Tony (Guest) 19 November 2014, 10:41

Phillipo,

I am usually with you on most of what you say on this side (pragmatic, emotion and drama free, factual....) but I must admit that I can't understand your last message.

How a recognition of Palestine will fix this matter? A recognition of this caliber will actually ban Israel from retaliation as such incursions will be termed "foreign invasions".
One would only have to count on security resolution to force the Palestinian government (to be) to enforce punishment on the culprits. We know that will not happen. Then the Mossad will have to resort again to covert assassinations.

No 2 state solution can be deployed without a top notch border separation - and a proper oversight of the 20% Arab Israel.

Tony the atheist nationalist Lebanese.

Missing phillipo 19 November 2014, 18:59

Tony
If terrorists, so whatever they want to be called, cross an international border illegaly, then the coiuntry into whose territory they cross has full rights in international law to retaliate against the country from where they came.
By the way, if you polled the million plus Israeli Arabs I very much doubt that 10% of them would want to live in a Palestinian State. At least in a poll like this they would have freedom of expression, I bet the Arabs in the West Bank and Gaza don't have that privilage

Thumb _mowaten_ 19 November 2014, 19:36

lol at your self-delusions.

Default-user-icon Tony (Guest) 19 November 2014, 20:03

I agree with you phil,

Your point is fair but, the world will beat Israel up if they retaliate when a small Islamic gang commits an atrocity. Hence why my suggestion that covert assassinations will be more effective...just an idea.

As to the Arab Israelis, I bet you are right - but some of them can and will still act as a fifth pillar. Think hizbullah in Lebanon who are ethnically Lebanese but spiritually Suleimanis.

I find it strange, but am one of the few leftist who does not believe in a 2 state solution. Some religious matters are too contentious and violent to allow it.

Mowaten: I am not sure that I fully understand your sarcasm and wonder if you can kindly develop further on the Seld-delusion point. As it stands, your comments adds little to this conversation.

Tony the atheist nationalist Lebanese.

Thumb _mowaten_ 19 November 2014, 10:58

yes terrorist, but while you say that you support those who are acting against it.

Thumb _mowaten_ 19 November 2014, 11:17

silly unfounded conspiracy theories.
syria and iran armed and supported hezbollah, and hezbollah is the one most dangerous enemy of zionism. was 2006 just for show? was the forced retreat in 2000 just for show?
not to mention that hezbollah iran and syria also armed supported and trained hamas for instance. several hezbollah men paid the price for that when moubarak the traitor arrested them and had them tortured and imprisoned.
the problem with people like you is that you put your sectarian hatred before reason and wisdom, people like isis who'd rather kill arabs and random innocents by the thousands rather than unite to fight the common enemy.