Lebanon to Elect President but Divisions Run Deep

إقرأ هذا الخبر بالعربية W460

Lebanon's parliament is set to end more than two years of stalemate on Monday by electing ex-general Michel Aoun as president, but the vote is unlikely to heal deep political divisions.

Aoun, a Christian former army chief, is allied with the Iran-backed Hizbullah movement whose forces are fighting in Syria alongside President Bashar Assad's government.

But his election has been made possible by the surprise endorsement of former prime minister Saad Hariri, a fierce opponent of Syria's government and head of a bloc that is Hizbullah's key rival and has received regional support from Saudi Arabia.

So, while a deal has been made on the country's next president, analysts say Lebanon's key political blocs still disagree on almost everything else.

Aoun is expected to nominate Hariri to return as prime minister, but with little consensus in the political landscape, the process of forming a government is likely to be long and arduous.

"Aoun's election is not a magic wand," said Sahar Atrache, a researcher at the International Crisis Group think tank.

"Certainly the presidential vacancy will end, but it doesn't solve the political crisis, or the stagnant political institutions or the major divisions over domestic and foreign issues, particularly the war in Syria," she told AFP.

- 'No common ground' -

Under a power-sharing agreement, Lebanon's presidency is reserved for a Maronite Christian while the prime minister is a Sunni Muslim and the speaker of parliament is a Shiite Muslim.

The presidency has been vacant since May 2014 when Michel Suleiman's mandate expired.

Since then, parliament has held 45 failed sessions to elect a successor, each time failing to make quorum.

Each session was boycotted by the 20 members of Aoun's parliamentary bloc who insisted he be elected, with Hizbullah also keeping its 13 members away as a show of support.

Monday's session is expected to involve two votes, with Aoun unlikely to win the two-thirds majority necessary to avoid a second round.

The additional round only requires him to win a 50 percent plus one majority, which now looks assured.

The vote is set to end a void that has been seen as a reflection of a broader malaise: a divided polity with government institutions that have been impotent in the face of challenges including a garbage collection crisis.

The economy meanwhile has struggled with regional and domestic instability and already strained resources have been tested by an influx of more than a million Syrian refugees.

"Given what we know from history and the profiles of the personalities that have come together and the overall political climate, nothing guarantees any progress from filling the vacancy," said Carol Sharabati, a political science professor at the Jesuit University in Beirut.

"We're looking at an alliance of interest, in which each party has their demands. Aoun wants the presidency at any cost, and Hariri wants to rebuild his crumbling political bloc," added Sharabati.

"Will the personal agendas of each party allow them to build a common, long-term strategy, given that their alliance is not formed on common ground?"

- 'Can't expect miracles' -

Atrache said the agreement could not be described as a "political alliance," and said it would "prove difficult to maintain because they don't agree on how to share power."

The track record of recent years does not bode well: the last government led by Hariri, between 2009 and 2011, was hamstrung by tensions with Hizbullah's bloc which eventually brought it down.

And after going into self-imposed exile, Hariri's influence has waned domestically even as his personal finances have taken a hit because key backer Saudi Arabia is no longer willing to pump aid into Lebanon to shore up its influence.

Last time Hariri formed a government, it took five months, and the incumbent, Tamam Salam, spent 10 months crafting a national unity cabinet, which has nonetheless proved largely impotent.

"We can't rule out the possibility that we'll have a president, a prime minister without a government and a suspended parliament" until the next legislative election, Sharabati said.

Parliament has twice extended its mandate without holding elections because of disagreements over a new electoral law, with the next vote scheduled for mid-2017.

Parliament speaker Nabih Berri, who opposes Aoun's election, has already said he expects the formation of a new government to take five to six months.

But even if a government is formed, it will be full of "contradictions, and the question is whether it will be able, even partially, to restore institutions and put them back on track," said Atrache.

"We can't expect miracles."

Comments 8
Default-user-icon kazan (Guest) 29 October 2016, 08:18

Throughout history, mankind fought wars, main reason power (read economic); the reality is that only the tiny elite minority profited from war results, the population on both sides were and still are the victims. Religion and ethnicity are the ingredients to motivate ordinary people. Alliances based on religion during the war, will disappear during the peace period. Discrimination based on ethnicity within the alliance will start, 1st class and second class citizen will manifest and ethnicity privileges are daily practice. Conclusion: Lebanese, you may have different religions ( foreign powers make abuse of it) but whether you like or not, you have the same ethnicity, accept this fact, and adapt to it. Then and only then you will enjoy prosperity, the country and the people do have the ingredients to achieve this goal.

Default-user-icon kazan (Guest) 29 October 2016, 08:28

Throughout history politicians abused the religion for their individual interests (Europe 1000A.D till begin 1900), by so doing populations were divided and wars were the result. Lebanon situation can be compared to medieval Europe, because of religion differences the population is divided. Moreover, because of the Lebanese history ( in fact no history), the Lebanese are accustomed to be governed by foreigners (in the past 400 years ,Ottomans , French, Americans you name it...).
All attempts to solve the presidential crisis are window dressing, like in the past it will distract the attention for a while.

Default-user-icon we've been here before (Guest) 29 October 2016, 09:39

all comes down to nabi beri wants to stay as president of the parliament (or else) ... and a consensus paralyzed cabinet empowering hezbollah (or else) ... which means... same ole same ole. still controlled by the pro syrian corrupted mafia of money, power, weapons, death threats. any politician desire justice and righteousness? peace and reconciliation? tourism? quality of life? job development?

Thumb suXessful 29 October 2016, 15:46

Dani Daou.. wala lambah!

Thumb chrisrushlau 29 October 2016, 16:51

Lebanese Maronite Patriarch al Rahi, presently in his native Switzerland on a ski holiday, issued a fatwa binding on all faiths against anyone mentioning Article 24 of the Lebanese Constitution which reserves half of Parliament's seats to Christians. His fatwa, or judicial edict, also mentioned that the main effect of Article 24 was to disenfranchise the Shia majority (which, according to Noam Chomsky, could form a Hezbollah on its own if freed to vote its numbers, a result he deplored). So the question is, why does Hezbollah refuse to exert its numbers in street demonstrations and other forms of political agitation to change the Constitution? Is democracy simple foreign to Lebanese DNA?

Thumb chrisrushlau 29 October 2016, 16:54

Patriarch al Rahi regrets that he omitted a word from his fatwa. He meant to say that Lebanon's Shia majority could form a Hezbollah government all on its own if allowed to vote freely. In a Parliamentary system, the government, or Prime Minister and cabinet, is formed by a group holding a majority of Parliamentary seats.

Default-user-icon Athiest (Guest) 29 October 2016, 17:26

Laughable country..politicians know for a FACT, Lebanese people are STUPID, they will do nothing but follow the herds...time to nuke this pos land, and have some other nation take over...

Thumb liberty 30 October 2016, 09:17

what about your shias ya troll, are they against the syrian occupation?