Geagea Believes 'Red Lines' on Law Agreement Won't be Crossed

إقرأ هذا الخبر بالعربية W460

Lebanese Forces chief Samir Geagea said he believes that political parties will not cross the deadlines set to agree on an electoral law, pointing out that the actual deadline is when the parliament's term ends in June, the pan-Arab Asharq al-Awsat daily reported on Saturday.

“The media is concerned but I am not worried. The actual red line is not May 15, but June 20, that is when the term of the parliament effectively ends. We have made deliberations in all directions. I believe that everyone realizes now how critical the situation is. Before we reach the red lines there will be an agreement on a new law,” Geagea told the daily in an interview.

The LF leader pointed out that options are now varying between adopting a “hybrid law, a fully proportional representation system or something in between.”

“No matter what format will be agreed, there will be elections at the beginning of autumn unless other calculated circumstances emerge,” he added.

Whether the LF would accept a technical term extension of the parliament if an agreement fails, Geagea: “I can't foretell what will our stance be. But my personal conviction is that we will reach an election law.”

The country has not organized parliamentary elections since 2009 and the legislature has instead twice extended its own mandate. The last polls were held under an amended version of the 1960 electoral law.

An anticipated parliament meeting is set to be held on May 15 where the parliament might extend its term once again if parties fail to reach a consensual agreement on a voting system that will rule the upcoming polls.

Several political parties have reiterated that a term extension, vacuum at the legislative authority and keeping the country's current 1960 majoritarian electoral system are all rejected.

Several law proposals were presented but none have so far been consensually agreed.

SourceNaharnet
Comments 5
Thumb chrisrushlau 06 May 2017, 14:08

"1960 majoritarian electoral system" means that the Article 24 set-aside of half of Parliament to Christians makes them as if they were the majority. It might have been better expressed as "majoritarianish".
"consensually agreed" means that an extension of this "system" does not need actual agreement by the public, the same status the National Pact and Taef Accord set-asides supposedly have. How, Naharnet, is the public supposed to agree to an "unwritten agreement"?
Why not do a census and see how many Christians, Shias, Sunnis, etc., there are? Why not abandon the whole sectarian recipe for instability?

Thumb galaxy 06 May 2017, 14:12

lol @ chris the shia christian:)!

Missing humble 06 May 2017, 16:02

Very deceived by the Hakim who has become politically correct....

Missing humble 06 May 2017, 16:04

As concerns Ebola, they do not count as Lebanese...they are 100% foreigners!!!

Missing humble 06 May 2017, 16:06

Finally : we must count the 13 million lebanese abroad. Do you see what I mean???