Report: Jumblat, Opposition at Loggerheads over Insistence to Keep Miqati at Helm of Cabinet

إقرأ هذا الخبر بالعربية W460

The major point of contention between Progressive Socialist Party leader Walid Jumblat and the March 14 opposition alliance is his insistence to reappoint Prime Minister Najib Miqati if the cabinet collapses, As Safir daily reported on Tuesday.

Jumblat, a centrist, has a major role in deciding the fate of the majority alliance that makes up the current Hizbullah-led cabinet.

The March 8 majority led by Hizbullah, backed by some of Jumblat’s 12-member National Struggle Front parliamentary bloc, brought Miqati to the premiership last year after ex-PM Saad Hariri’s national unity cabinet was toppled by the Hizbullah-led alliance.

The United States and France have given a clear signal to Saudi officials that Jumblat would not accept another person as head of the government if Miqati's cabinet resigns, As Safir said.

The report came a day after the PSP announced that U.S. Deputy Secretary of State William Burns telephoned Jumblat, asking him to help form a new government while avoiding a power vacuum in the country.

“Jumblat reiterated his stance that he does not mind an agreement on forming a new government, noting that that is only possible through supporting President Michel Suleiman's efforts and his nonstop endeavor to keep dialogue channels open among the Lebanese parties and to mend the severed ties that only worsen the stalemate,” the PSP added.

French President Francois Hollande visited Beirut on Sunday during which he held talks with his Lebanese counterpart Michel Suleiman. He later traveled to Jeddah where he met with Saudi King Abdullah in the presence of Hariri.

Political tension grew last month after the assassination of Internal Security Forces Intelligence Bureau chief Wissam al-Hasan.

The March 14 opposition led by Hariri blamed Miqati's government for al-Hasan's killing in a car bomb blast in Beirut’s Ashrafiyeh district and demanded the formation of a neutral salvation cabinet.

Comments 4
Thumb thepatriot 06 November 2012, 15:29

@zadig, I hear you,and you are right... but there is a Major difference! Embracing the Iranians is more like embracing an ideology. Hariri would be too weak without a strong major power to have his back. Unfortunately, he cannot rely on the west and therefore remains close to ksa. It is very nice to say that we want no external interference (indeed we don't), but what can you do when your political oponent receives instruction, money, weapons, and political support from syria and Iran...

Default-user-icon MUSTAPHA O. GHALAYINI (Guest) 06 November 2012, 15:33

that is the condition that hizballa imposed to change the gvmt,and have a new gvmt of three tens or three eights and perhaps 8,8,12.

Default-user-icon jabali (Guest) 06 November 2012, 18:04

exactly, saad hides in saudi, nassrallah hides in tehran. meanwhile, Junblatt is apparantly a sell out because he opted to stay! go figure hypocrites!

Default-user-icon somelebdude (Guest) 06 November 2012, 20:52

@zadig: What would be the point of Saad sacrificing himself? How a dead Hariri would improve the calculus on Lebanon's freedom, and democracy? It won't.
This wave of assassinations has proved one thing; democratic tools cannot be used by one side only. People can't exercise their rights when there is a gun pointed at them. So if Hariri's presence in France, Saudia Arabia will help remove that gun, then that is a much better use of his time than living in hiding in Beirut unable to say what needs to be said in order to preserve his live. Case in point: Jumblat, every time he makes a stand on something he has to flip on it so he is not taken out. At the end of the day the Lebanese people won’t be able to continue to think they can fight terrorism through the ballot boxes alone.
s a stand on something he has to flip on it so he is not taken out