Britain Shuts Iran Embassy in London, Expels Staff

إقرأ هذا الخبر بالعربية W460

Britain closed its Tehran embassy on Wednesday after evacuating all its diplomats from Iran as part of a "very tough" response to the storming of the mission the day before by Iranian protesters.

Foreign Secretary William Hague said Britain had also ordered Iran to vacate its embassy in London by Friday, stressing it did not mean diplomatic ties between the two countries had been entirely cut off.

The pull-out of all British embassy staff from Iran to Dubai in the neighboring United Arab Emirates was completed by late Wednesday, western diplomats told AFP.

Britain's moves followed violent scenes Tuesday, when protesters rampaged for hours through its two diplomatic compounds in Tehran.

They tore down the British flag, smashed windows, trashed embassy offices, set documents alight, and briefly blocked the movements of six British diplomats. No British personnel were hurt, having taken refuge in secure areas.

Iranian police, initially inactive, ultimately forced the protesters to leave after firing tear gas and clashing with them.

Speaking to parliament on Wednesday, Hague expressed skepticism at what he called the "belated" response by the Iranian authorities to stop the protesters attacking the compounds.

"The idea that the Iranian authorities could not have protected our embassy or that this assault could have taken place without some degree of regime consent is fanciful."

He said diplomatic ties would continue with Iran, albeit at a much reduced level.

"This does not amount to the severing of diplomatic relations in their entirety. It is action that reduces our relations with Iran to the lowest level consistent with the maintenance of diplomatic relations," Hague said.

The incursions and Britain's response dramatically heighten tensions between the West and Iran over the Islamic republic's controversial nuclear program.

The protests in Tehran -- which Hague said would not have occurred "without some degree of regime consent" -- had been called to express anger over Britain's announcement last week that it was halting all transactions with Iran's financial system, including its central bank.

Iranian officials this week retaliated by passing a law kicking out the British ambassador and downgrading diplomatic ties. The main anti-British demonstration was called at the same time.

Other European missions were Wednesday evaluating the security situation in the Iranian capital. Norway announced the temporary closure of its embassy, though its staff remained in Tehran.

International condemnation of the violent incursions was fierce and broad.

The U.N. Security Council, the United States, the European Union, France, Germany and even Iran's ally Russia all slammed them as unacceptable.

British Prime Minister David Cameron vowed that, following the diplomats' evacuation, "very tough action" would be taken against Iran.

Officials in Tehran were contrite or defiant over the protesters' actions.

Iran's foreign ministry expressed "regret" over the incident, and deputy police chief Ahmed Reza Radan was quoted by IRNA state news agency as saying a number of protesters had been arrested and others were being sought.

But parliamentary speaker Ali Larijani defended the protesters, saying they had been "angered by the British government's behavior" and "decades of domineering moves by the British in Iran."

The U.N. condemnation was "hasty," he told lawmakers, according to state television.

The head of parliament's security and foreign policy committee, Alaeddin Boroujerdi, said Iran "respects" all treaties protecting foreign diplomats and embassies.

"This issue must in no way cause concern for other diplomats and embassies," he was quoted as saying by IRNA.

Britain's sanctions against Iran's financial system were announced last week in conjunction with similar measures by the United States and Canada.

Although protests against Western embassies are frequent in Tehran, the storming of the British embassy was by far the worst since 1979, when Islamic students broke into the U.S. embassy, taking 52 Americans hostage for 444 days.

That act resulted in the breaking of all diplomatic ties between the United States and Iran.

Comments 5
Thumb libnani 30 November 2011, 17:10

Although I don't like Iran's government or their supporters, I understand these guys. Britain and the Western world is what divided the Arabs and Muslims and poisoned us with nationalism. Nationalism brought political parties that have worse morals than the devil (baath party of Syria, all the ones that massacred people in the civil war, Hezbollah, etc). Since these countries put Lebanon and other Arab countries in hell, we should disassociate with them. Also, they are getting mad for storming their embassy? Then we should be even angrier for storming our COUNTRIES and sending them to hell! And for supporting the dictators that blocked our progress for years and years!

Thumb Bandoul 30 November 2011, 17:56

???? Britain and the Western world is what divided the Arabs and Muslims ????

Please cite a date and time in history where Arabs and Muslim were united and at peace with one another.

I am sick and tired of people never taking responsibility for their lives and their failures. It is always someone else's fault...the way of the coward.

Better yet, blame everything no matter what it is on the west! This way you will never have to stand up and take control of your lives and you can justify any immoral, irrational and ideological behavior without any type of reproach. PATHETIC!

Thumb Bandoul 30 November 2011, 18:03

People who sympathize with and rationalize the need for violence to resolve any kind of problem, political or otherwise, are themselves promoting and advocating lawlessness and criminality that is contrary to morality and every known kind of religion.

Thumb libnani 30 November 2011, 21:53

Haha, I will tell you. No matter what any you of you Western loving idiots say, the best time for us, the Arabs, all the Arabs, no matter what faith, was at the time of the Islamic ruled empires and dynasties. The world came to the Middle East to learn the sciences, or went to Moorish SPain. Then the Ottoman Empire declined, and the West invaded the Middle East, divided our countries, instilled their racist stupid values. If you like the West so much, invite them yalla, let them do to every country what they did to Iraq, what they will do in Libya, etc. Btw, if it was not for "secularism", or "nationalism", That stupid man Bashar al Assad wouldn't be doing what he is doing. We need to uproot all these governments that are blocking our progress, and use what benefited us in the time of our glory again. The truth is in history, you can use your love of the imperialists to back you up, but in the end, you are wrong.

Thumb Bandoul 01 December 2011, 17:24

people who use the terms "Western loving idiots" and "instilled their racist stupid values" and "use your love of the imperialists" give us a clear insight into what kind of individuals they themselves are.

Those are the same people who would stand on their head to get a visa to immigrate to the western world to take advantages of the liberties to achieve their dreams and all the meanwhile cursing the host country, promoting sharia law and speaking passionately about how wonderful their home countries are. Hypocrits,every last one of them.

The is the cancer spreading throughtout the world. These are the people who will eventually give their masters who opress and exterminate them to bring about the third world war.