there's nothing funny here geha, as usual you show your "selective" humanism here by smiling at the thought of 125 innocent and unarmed civilians being slaughtered in probably very hideous ways, only because they are alawites. whatever the war, this is a war crime and a crime against humanity.
if you support such people, and pretend to believe they are the ones who will bring freedom and democracy to syria than i dont know what to say to you, actually i have nothing to say to you.
arzak: yes i totally do, the more the rebels commit such crimes the more the population realize that bashar, although not irreproachable, is the lesser evil.
he still has wide support in the population, which is made clear by the fact that after 20-21 months he is still holding on very well despite the "rebels" policy of gruesomely massacring all those who support him
WTF arzak?
this is blind terrorism and massacre, and has been going on since the early stages of the so-called "rebellion".
this article has the nerve to say "Aqrab is located near Houla, a majority Sunni Muslim village where 108 people, including 49 children and 34 women, were massacred on May 25 in what was widely blamed on pro-regime militias despite denials from Damascus."
when we know the victims in houla were also alawites, and if indeed it was "widely" and INSTANTLY blamed on the regime at the time, as soon as the fact that the victimes were alawites came out there was an instant blackout over it by western diplomats.
how can you in your right mind support the terrorist blackmail? how can you say assad should abandon the country and its people to those who committed these atrocities? they kill out of sectarian hatred, and if assad goes you can kiss all non-hardwing sunni goodbye; kurds, christians, moderate sunnis, shias all are takfirs in the eyes of the salafi, and all indicates they're getting the knife if assad goes down.
whatever the reasons you decide for them, those 60% (i believe more but will go with your figure) still support the regime. have they no say? cant they chose? IF -and i cant stress the IF enough- they chose that because they prefer stability and peace, then who are you to decide that death chaos and destruction is better for them?
marked. but tell me, will you do like geha who asked us to mark his words promising an israeli war against us "before the US elections" and repeated that for two months before suddenly pretending he never said it?
see you in february andre.
yes geha, the US recognition was not slowed down because "the coalition, recently reconstituted under U.S. pressure, did not represent all of Syrian society, had links to extremists, and did not fully subscribe to democratic principles." (which is a euphemism and still true today)
no, it was slowed because an official US recognition of the terrorists is damaging to both the US and the terrorists.
while the former's condemnation of al nusra should be enough for a smokescreen on their domestic scene (poor cheeseburger brains can easily be fed selective info about a conflict in a remote country) the latter's endorsement by the US is a strong signal of where they stand politically, and comes as a confirmation to anyone who had any doubt, that the so-called rebels are a US-saudi-qatari tool to topple the last pro-Arab regime in the Arab world.
therefore, the majority of Syrians who still support assad will be re-asserted in their stand, while those who were still balancing will have one more reason to support bashar, and maybe a fraction of the minority who supported the salafi throat slicers will wake up that these are not fighting a "holy jihad", but have sold their souls to the USraeli devil.
anyway, tony, as far as i know you already packed and ran long time ago, any advice for us?
or maybe we could ask the experts of pack-and-run for some tips? (let me think, hariri, israel, the GIs... humm many options here)
you're sick tony, very sick. you're the kind of fakearse who would condemn torture on one side with crocodile tears, while supporting torture on the other.
Syria Issues Arrest Warrants against Hariri, MP Saqr, Louay Meqdad
12 December 2012, 11:29there's nothing funny here geha, as usual you show your "selective" humanism here by smiling at the thought of 125 innocent and unarmed civilians being slaughtered in probably very hideous ways, only because they are alawites. whatever the war, this is a war crime and a crime against humanity.
if you support such people, and pretend to believe they are the ones who will bring freedom and democracy to syria than i dont know what to say to you, actually i have nothing to say to you.
arzak: yes i totally do, the more the rebels commit such crimes the more the population realize that bashar, although not irreproachable, is the lesser evil.
he still has wide support in the population, which is made clear by the fact that after 20-21 months he is still holding on very well despite the "rebels" policy of gruesomely massacring all those who support him
Syria Issues Arrest Warrants against Hariri, MP Saqr, Louay Meqdad
12 December 2012, 11:31what is the stake?
anyway, the bet is off:
http://english.al-akhbar.com/content/sakr%E2%80%99s-flimsy-%E2%80%98not-so-smart%E2%80%99-fabrications
125 Victims in Syria Alawite Village Bombings
12 December 2012, 12:16WTF arzak?
this is blind terrorism and massacre, and has been going on since the early stages of the so-called "rebellion".
this article has the nerve to say "Aqrab is located near Houla, a majority Sunni Muslim village where 108 people, including 49 children and 34 women, were massacred on May 25 in what was widely blamed on pro-regime militias despite denials from Damascus."
when we know the victims in houla were also alawites, and if indeed it was "widely" and INSTANTLY blamed on the regime at the time, as soon as the fact that the victimes were alawites came out there was an instant blackout over it by western diplomats.
125 Victims in Syria Alawite Village Bombings
12 December 2012, 12:16how can you in your right mind support the terrorist blackmail? how can you say assad should abandon the country and its people to those who committed these atrocities? they kill out of sectarian hatred, and if assad goes you can kiss all non-hardwing sunni goodbye; kurds, christians, moderate sunnis, shias all are takfirs in the eyes of the salafi, and all indicates they're getting the knife if assad goes down.
125 Victims in Syria Alawite Village Bombings
12 December 2012, 12:19whatever the reasons you decide for them, those 60% (i believe more but will go with your figure) still support the regime. have they no say? cant they chose? IF -and i cant stress the IF enough- they chose that because they prefer stability and peace, then who are you to decide that death chaos and destruction is better for them?
In Long-Awaited Move, Obama Recognizes Syrian Rebels
12 December 2012, 12:29marked. but tell me, will you do like geha who asked us to mark his words promising an israeli war against us "before the US elections" and repeated that for two months before suddenly pretending he never said it?
see you in february andre.
In Long-Awaited Move, Obama Recognizes Syrian Rebels
12 December 2012, 12:33yes geha, the US recognition was not slowed down because "the coalition, recently reconstituted under U.S. pressure, did not represent all of Syrian society, had links to extremists, and did not fully subscribe to democratic principles." (which is a euphemism and still true today)
no, it was slowed because an official US recognition of the terrorists is damaging to both the US and the terrorists.
while the former's condemnation of al nusra should be enough for a smokescreen on their domestic scene (poor cheeseburger brains can easily be fed selective info about a conflict in a remote country) the latter's endorsement by the US is a strong signal of where they stand politically, and comes as a confirmation to anyone who had any doubt, that the so-called rebels are a US-saudi-qatari tool to topple the last pro-Arab regime in the Arab world.
In Long-Awaited Move, Obama Recognizes Syrian Rebels
12 December 2012, 12:36therefore, the majority of Syrians who still support assad will be re-asserted in their stand, while those who were still balancing will have one more reason to support bashar, and maybe a fraction of the minority who supported the salafi throat slicers will wake up that these are not fighting a "holy jihad", but have sold their souls to the USraeli devil.
In Long-Awaited Move, Obama Recognizes Syrian Rebels
12 December 2012, 12:38maybe he meant the day of the racoons?
anyway, tony, as far as i know you already packed and ran long time ago, any advice for us?
or maybe we could ask the experts of pack-and-run for some tips? (let me think, hariri, israel, the GIs... humm many options here)
In Long-Awaited Move, Obama Recognizes Syrian Rebels
12 December 2012, 12:40you're sick tony, very sick. you're the kind of fakearse who would condemn torture on one side with crocodile tears, while supporting torture on the other.