As much as I hate Naharnet's policies, I congratulate them for their consistently good choices of pictures for the articles. The pictures they choose often convey their hidden message more successfully than their frequent twistings of the truth.
Jumblatt has basically informed Nasrallah that he is abiding by Nasrallah's request to go along with the Electricity plan of Tayyar. You will see the result in the news soon.
Anyone knows the story of the frog who thought he was a prince?
I think Sarkozy thinks he is the one who removed Kaddafi (not the Libyan people) and is overwhelmed by drunkenness from a fake (and still incomplete) success to the point he is having illusions. The guy is pathetic.
small.ape, if you think NATO could have succeeded without the Libyan people, then you are not only ignorant, but also stupid. Let NATO dare fire a single bullet on Syria and then post your dumbness here. NATO would have done it had they not been aware that it would mean the end of Israel as well as oil supplies for them. Read Iran's warnings on this. :)
You idiots above are getting dumber day by day. Perhaps this has to do with the fact that your source of information is Naharnet. Yes, read the warnings from Iran to the West and to NATO and you will understand that if NATO attacks Syria, hell will break loose and the war will not be limited to Syria. This is the point. NATO will not attack Syria for the same reason they never dared to attack Iran. Please no one of you retards tell me that they have not attacked Iran out of good will. They want to destroy Iran even more than you do :) They have not because they simply cannot afford the closing of the Gulf and the resulting oil prices, they cannot afford to have U.S. bases and Israel showered with missiles. They cannot afford such a war from a loss of life viewpoint or from an economical viewpoint (their economy is already collapsing with gas prices at $4/gallon.
Another reason they have attacked is they know the majority of the people in Iran is with the regime and a large chunk of the people in Syria is with the regime. They can count on nobody in Iran, and in Syria the most they can do is start a civil war.
Another reason they will not attack Syria, you idiots, is that Syria, unlike Libya, has no oil or other riches to steal. They are not concerned about the Syrian people, and certainly not about the few losers of March 14 in Lebanon. This talk by Sarkozy is just talk. the one who wants to act, does not talk.
Suleiman Holds 'Long' Phone Conversation with Assad
30 August 2011, 23:15As much as I hate Naharnet's policies, I congratulate them for their consistently good choices of pictures for the articles. The pictures they choose often convey their hidden message more successfully than their frequent twistings of the truth.
Jumblat Informs Nasrallah his Stance from Electricity Draft Law is Technical
31 August 2011, 14:48Jumblatt has basically informed Nasrallah that he is abiding by Nasrallah's request to go along with the Electricity plan of Tayyar. You will see the result in the news soon.
France Defends Libyan Ex-Jihadi Rebel Commander
31 August 2011, 19:49As long as they get the riches of Libya, they don't care who comes to power. Al Qaeda included.
Berri: Issue of Resistance Not Up for Discussion
31 August 2011, 19:58@amirmansour: I assume your call is for all the parties, groups, clans and gangs in Lenanon? Right?
Berri: Issue of Resistance Not Up for Discussion
31 August 2011, 19:58As usual, 70% of the content of the speech is blacked out. MSR again! (Selective Malignant Reporting-- a term devised for Naharnet only).
Anyone who has the slight interest for what Berri said today should go to another news source.
Sarkozy: Iran Ambitions May Provoke Attack, Assad Actions Irreparable
31 August 2011, 20:30Anyone knows the story of the frog who thought he was a prince?
I think Sarkozy thinks he is the one who removed Kaddafi (not the Libyan people) and is overwhelmed by drunkenness from a fake (and still incomplete) success to the point he is having illusions. The guy is pathetic.
Sarkozy: Iran Ambitions May Provoke Attack, Assad Actions Irreparable
31 August 2011, 20:31Check the real Sarkozy on Youtube:
www.youtube.com/watch?v=7CjX4Uypytg
Sarkozy: Iran Ambitions May Provoke Attack, Assad Actions Irreparable
31 August 2011, 21:07small.ape, if you think NATO could have succeeded without the Libyan people, then you are not only ignorant, but also stupid. Let NATO dare fire a single bullet on Syria and then post your dumbness here. NATO would have done it had they not been aware that it would mean the end of Israel as well as oil supplies for them. Read Iran's warnings on this. :)
Sarkozy: Iran Ambitions May Provoke Attack, Assad Actions Irreparable
31 August 2011, 23:35You idiots above are getting dumber day by day. Perhaps this has to do with the fact that your source of information is Naharnet. Yes, read the warnings from Iran to the West and to NATO and you will understand that if NATO attacks Syria, hell will break loose and the war will not be limited to Syria. This is the point. NATO will not attack Syria for the same reason they never dared to attack Iran. Please no one of you retards tell me that they have not attacked Iran out of good will. They want to destroy Iran even more than you do :) They have not because they simply cannot afford the closing of the Gulf and the resulting oil prices, they cannot afford to have U.S. bases and Israel showered with missiles. They cannot afford such a war from a loss of life viewpoint or from an economical viewpoint (their economy is already collapsing with gas prices at $4/gallon.
Sarkozy: Iran Ambitions May Provoke Attack, Assad Actions Irreparable
31 August 2011, 23:39Another reason they have attacked is they know the majority of the people in Iran is with the regime and a large chunk of the people in Syria is with the regime. They can count on nobody in Iran, and in Syria the most they can do is start a civil war.
Another reason they will not attack Syria, you idiots, is that Syria, unlike Libya, has no oil or other riches to steal. They are not concerned about the Syrian people, and certainly not about the few losers of March 14 in Lebanon. This talk by Sarkozy is just talk. the one who wants to act, does not talk.