Berri Says 'No Alternative' to Taef Accord, Rules Out 'Constituent Assembly'

إقرأ هذا الخبر بالعربية W460

Speaker Nabih Berri stressed Thursday that “there is no alternative” to the 1989 Taef Accord that ended the civil war while ruling out the possibility of holding a so-called constituent assembly in the foreseeable future.

“Commitment to the Taef Accord is final and let no one think of any new constituent assembly. The Taef Accord is not a Quran or a Bible, but changing it is out of the question,” said Berri in a speech at an economic conference for Lebanese expats.

“There is no better alternative at the moment and you must first implement the Taef Accord before talking about improving it,” the speaker added.

There are fears in the country that the ongoing political and presidential vacuum might eventually lead to introducing constitutional amendments or holding a constituent assembly that would radically change the current political system that is based on a delicate distribution of power among the country's sects.

Berri himself and Hizbullah have been recently accused of seeking a constituent assembly aimed at altering the political system in their favor.

In June 2012, Hizbullah chief Sayyed Hassan Nasrallah openly called for “a constituent assembly elected by the people.”

“Why don't we form a constituent assembly elected by the people -- not on a sectarian or regional basis but on the basis of competency -- in order to discuss all options. Let it discuss the Taef Accord, a new social contract or a non-sectarian system,” he said.

“We must support the state and its institutions if we want Lebanon to remain unified in this region that is facing the threat of segregation. I'm not talking slogans, we believe in this approach and we are educating our cadres accordingly. Lebanon cannot bear partitioning or federalism and its future can only be secured through a real, capable state ruled by law rather than factional affiliations,” said Nasrallah.

He also called for “a conference that would put Lebanon on the right track.”

Comments 3
Thumb thepatriot 14 July 2016, 16:28

When i see your face, i see the face of a thief.

Thumb chrisrushlau 14 July 2016, 18:27

The Taef principles are not an accord since the public was not given a chance to vote on them. Would the people vote to give the 25% Christian demographic slice half of the seats in Parliament?
As for "thief", when what you have you don't own, the proper owner has the right to take it back if the authorities don't do it first.

Default-user-icon sami fawaz (Guest) 15 July 2016, 12:13

Christians are 40% not 25% get you facts straight