After Deadlock, Syria Talks to Tackle Transition

إقرأ هذا الخبر بالعربية W460

Syrian peace talks in Geneva were deadlocked Monday over the issue of transferring power, but neither side walked away and the U.N. said the question of a political transition would be back on the table.

U.N. mediator Lakhdar Brahimi admitted that talks "haven't produced much". But he said he would bring the country's warring sides together again on Tuesday for another attempt at political discussions.

"Tomorrow we are going to put forward the Geneva communique... Then we are going to decide with them how we are going to proceed in discussing its many elements," he said, in reference to a text agreed by world powers in 2012 that calls for the creation of a transitional governing body in Syria.

"We are doing what the situation allows, what the market can bear," he told reporters when pressed on the slow pace of peace efforts.

Monday marked the third day of U.N.-sponsored talks between the two sides in Geneva and the first dealing with political issues.

The two sides have been brought together in the biggest diplomatic push yet to end a civil war that has left more than 130,000 dead and forced millions from their homes.

Monday's session broke up quickly after the regime set out a statement of principles that did not deal with a political transition and was immediately rejected by the opposition.

Regime delegation member Buthaina Shaaban said the government had presented "political principles which we thought no two Syrian persons should disagree with" -- including protecting the country's sovereignty, preserving state institutions and stopping the threat from "terrorist" groups.

"We were surprised that this basic paper was rejected by the other side," she said.

Rima Fleihan, a member of the opposition National Coalition's delegation, said: "The discussions were not constructive today because of the regime's strategy to deflect... (and) change the subject by talking of terrorism."

Officials on both sides said they had no plans to leave the talks however.

"We are not relying on the government side, we know their way, we hope they will start to change it... We are going to be patient," said Louay Safi, a member of the opposition delegation.

The opposition says President Bashar Assad must leave power and a transitional government be formed based on the agreement reached during a first peace conference in Geneva in 2012.

The regime says Assad's role is not up for debate at this conference -- dubbed Geneva II -- and denies that the initial Geneva deal requires him to go.

In Damascus, official Syrian media made it clear that Assad's continued leadership remained a line that negotiators would not cross.

"Those who are deluding themselves must understand that the government delegation to Geneva II did not go to this conference to hand power to those who have conspired against the people," the Tishreen state newspaper said.

"They are in Geneva to speak in the name of the Syrian people who have been the target of terrorism by armed groups linked to al-Qaida," it said.

The regime accuses the opposition and its international backers of promoting "terrorism" in the country, pointing to militant Islamist rebel groups like the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIL) and the Al-Nusra Front.

In the first tangible promise to emerge from the talks, Brahimi said Sunday the regime had agreed to allow women and children safe passage from besieged rebel-held areas of the city of Homs.

The regime's promise raised some hopes of humanitarian relief, but was greeted by skepticism on the ground.

Activists in rebel areas of Homs said residents had "no trust" in the regime and first wanted aid supplies and guarantees that those leaving would not be arrested.

The opposition also raised concerns about a regime demand to receive a list of names of men who want to leave, saying this was part of intelligence gathering.

The Old City of Homs has been under siege since June 2012 after rebels there rose against the regime, with an estimated 500 families living with near-daily shelling and the barest of supplies.

Brahimi has also expressed hope that a convoy of humanitarian aid will be allowed to enter the besieged area on Monday, saying rebel forces had already agreed and the local governor was considering the issue.

The Red Cross said there had been "no concrete step" to provide humanitarian relief in Homs on Monday.

Comments 15
Thumb beiruti 27 January 2014, 16:02

Sure they are, of course. "Political transition" for the Assad Regime means that you first must kill all of the existing members of the regime, then you can "transition" to a new one.
For the Opposition and the mediators, it means holding a free and fair election.
The Assad Regime members will not be partners in executing their own death warrants. This is what political transition means to them. It is a matter that can only be resolved on the battlefield. This is not as the international community or the opposition wants it, but it is the terms as dictated by Assad for "transitioning" from power.

Thumb Mystic 27 January 2014, 20:17

It is important that they bring the terrorism into question. The opposition has been very rude in these talks, and they haven't even pointed out at anytime, what sort of crimes their fighters has committed.

In order to be political settlement, and if the international community wants to appear neutral, then they should look at the crimes of all sides, and search for evidence who is behind these crimes.

Thumb general_puppet 27 January 2014, 23:50

Mistic is a proud supporter of the Assad clan, he dreams of a day that Lebanon is annexed into Syria. Then he will truly be able to call Assad "my President for life"

Thumb beiruti 27 January 2014, 21:09

@josephani, in fact I have not been taught that violence is the answer to anything. I do not nor have ever even owned a firearm. My comment was on the nature of the Regime. It only responds to force or to the credible threat of the use thereof.
I see that you too use the "halt terrorism" mantra that is used by the Regime, Hezbollah and Iran which indicates where lies your sympathies in the Syrian Conflict. The Assad Regime uses terrorism, hires terrorists and have let them loose on Lebanon. It is not a tactic exclusive to just one side of the conflict.
As an outside observer, only an election solves this, but Assad will never agree.

Thumb -phoenix1 27 January 2014, 16:22

Mr. Lakhdar El Ibrahimi made it clear last year, that it is of the utmost importance to give the Syrian regime an exit strategy, otherwise matters are doomed to failure, especially dialog. Today in 2014, this exit strategy carries even more weight than before and for good reasons, none of the protagonists on the field are capable of pushing the other out militarily. However now their greatest common enemy is the element of radicalism that is purely non-Syrian, if the Syrians don't agree to a timetable to be overseen by the international community, then the day will come when both will lose Syria for good. Give Al Assad and his regime this exit strategy, give him full guarantees for his sect in Syria, then the talks will continue.

Thumb Mystic 27 January 2014, 20:21

Indeed phoenix, the Syrians should determine how the country is run, not the foreigners whom came to create "caliphate" and doesn't know a thing about Syria and it's people.

Thumb Mystic 27 January 2014, 20:27

Nor should the international community have any affect on how Syria is run, it is for the Syrian people to decide no one else.

Thumb general_puppet 27 January 2014, 18:22

"In Damascus, official Syrian media made it clear that Assad's continued leadership remained a red line that negotiators would not cross."… Assad has made it clear, he is not planing on stepping down. His idea of a government transition is when he hands the presidency over to his son in about 20 years time.

Thumb ToniFarris 27 January 2014, 22:32

Play ASSad game. lol

https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.bengigi.stopassad

Thumb cedars2 27 January 2014, 18:30

"The two sides have been brought together in the biggest diplomatic push yet to end a civil war that has left more than 130,000 dead and forced millions from their homes."

Thumb cedars2 27 January 2014, 18:33

Now why wouldn't the Syrians and the sunnis in particular not vote for this fine example of democracy and freedom. His leadership methods are looked up to by some of our finest politicians.

Thumb ToniFarris 27 January 2014, 22:39

ASSad power depends on a wider group of people in his own family and of course other members of government and I am not sure how free he is to pursue a reform agenda, even if he wanted to do so.

To Better understand the mechanics of the Syrian regime, people must go beyond the figurehead to examine the nexus of power at the heart of the Damascene court – an opaque and complex palatial MAFIA whose lesser known characters wield inordinate amounts of power.

Thumb ToniFarris 27 January 2014, 22:46

Download Android App. Stop ASSad - The Dictator

https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.bengigi.stopassad

Thumb ice-man 28 January 2014, 06:00

Sorry tony, the resistance and Aounis use iPhones.

Thumb ToniFarris 28 January 2014, 07:00

Let's make one for Apple. lol