Obama Vows to Save Iraqis Stranded on Mountain

إقرأ هذا الخبر بالعربية W460

U.S. President Barack Obama vowed Saturday to help rescue thousands of civilians besieged by jihadists on an Iraqi mountain, as an MP warned they would not survive much longer.

He gave no timetable for the first U.S. operation in Iraq since the last American troops withdrew three years ago and put the onus on Iraqi politicians to form an inclusive government and turn the tide on jihadist expansion.

"The United States can't just look away. That’s not who we are. We're Americans. We act. We lead. And that's what we're going to do on that mountain," Obama said.

U.S. and Iraqi aircraft have air dropped food and water to the thousands of people, many of them members of the Yazidi minority, who have been stranded on Mount Sinjar since they fled Islamic State attacks on their homes a week ago.

Obama said he had received "strong support" from British Prime Minister David Cameron and French President Francois Hollande, who had both agreed to provide humanitarian assistance.

Amid reports that the children and elderly among them were already dying, Obama justified the decision to intervene Thursday with the risk of an impending genocide against the Yazidis.

Yazidi MP Vian Dakhil, whose poignant appeal in parliament this week made her the public voice of her community, said time was running out.

"We have one or two days left to help these people. After that they will start dying en masse," she told Agence France Presse Saturday .

The Yazidis, who worship a figure associated with the devil by many Muslims, are a small and closed community, one of Iraq's most vulnerable minorities.

After a first day of U.S. air raids on fighters who had moved within striking distance of Kurdistan, a top official in the autonomous region said the time had come for a fightback.

"Following the U.S. strikes, the peshmerga will first regroup, second redeploy in areas they retreated from and third help the displaced return to their homes," Fuad Hussein told reporters Friday in the Kurdish capital Arbil.

The first U.S. bombings struck IS positions and at least one convoy of vehicles carrying militants west of Arbil.

Obama said he had authorized the strikes in Iraq to protect U.S. personnel serving there. "And, if necessary, that's what we will continue to do," he said Saturday.

Federal and Kurdish officials, who had been at loggerheads since IS fighters launched their an offensive exactly two months ago that has brought Iraq to the brink of partition, have said they were now working together and with U.S. advisers.

But it remained unclear how much longer and deeper inside Iraq U.S. warplanes would intervene and Obama stressed the real game-changer would be the much-delayed formation of an inclusive government.

"The most important timetable I'm focused (on) now is the Iraqi government getting formed and finalized, because in the absence of an Iraqi government, it is very hard to get a unified effort by Iraqis against" IS, he said.

Many Iraqis see Prime Minister Nuri al-Maliki as partly responsible to entrenching sectarianism and providing IS with a fertile ground in Sunni areas.

He won April elections comfortably but the militant onslaught launched in June ahs been his position untenable.

Washington, Tehran, the Shiite religious leadership and much of his own party have pulled their support but has dug his heels in and apparently not yet given up on seeking a third term.

Grand Ayatollah Ali al-Sistani, Iraq's most revered Shiite cleric, on Saturday alluded to Maliki when he complained "there were some people who do not want the good of the country."

He was being quoted, after a meeting in the city of Najaf, by Chaldean Catholic Patriarch Louis Sako, whose community was displaced on an unprecedented scale this week.

Up to 100,000 Christians were forced to flee from their homes in a matter of hours on Thursday, completely emptying the country's largest Christian city Qaraqosh of its population.

Among the hundreds of thousands of people who fled their homes in northern Iraq were several other minorities such as the Shabak and Turkmen Shiites.

UNESCO chief Irina Bokova called it an "emerging cultural cleansing".

"The U.S. should strike Sinjar, even if there are civilian casualties. It's better than letting everyone die," the Yazidi MP, Vian Dakhil, said.

Obama said he was confident the U.S. could prevent IS fighters "from going up the mountain and slaughtering the people who are there" but added the next step of creating a safe passage was "logistically complicated".

The International Rescue Committee (IRC) is providing emergency care to around 4,000 people who crossed safely into neighboring Syria.

"They suffer from dehydration, sunstroke and some of them are seriously traumatized," the IRC's Suzanna Tkalec told AFP, adding that many had walked all day for several days.

Comments 10
Thumb lebanon_first 09 August 2014, 08:04

I wonder why the interference now, so late, after all the sh.. that ISIS did. I think Obama considers Irbil a red line. Or he was pressured by christian religious leaders.

It suits the US to have a contained ISIS facing Iran, but they do not want it to be too strong.

Thumb ex-fpm 09 August 2014, 08:21

The U.S intervention has no human side to it. The Obama Administration has evidence IS is close to securing Kurdish oilfields that supply Israel thru Turkey with relatively cheap oil. Hence, the air strikes and further expected military intervention. Syrian women and children have been massacred and gassed for 3 years and Obama has not lifted a finger.

Obama mentioned the U.S mission and military advisors in Erbil are threatened! So instead of pulling his mission out like he did in Libya, he authorized airstrikes.

Default-user-icon Adrian (Guest) 10 August 2014, 00:29

To ex-fpm: You are completely wrong. As the President said, US want to protest the people that took refugee in the mountains. He stated this thing very clear. Which part you did not understand? US sent food and water. Which other country did that to these people? Nobody my friend. We, the americans, have moral values.

Thumb ex-fpm 09 August 2014, 09:20

it seems you agree with me:) The bottom line is the USA acts to protect its own or Israeli interests.

Missing panzergen 09 August 2014, 09:38

If the US intervention has no sides to it, then why drop 3 plane loads of food and water? In your other subject, the war in Syria is a civil war, both side commit unbelievable atrocities. At least Assad protects all minorities and all faith. The Sunni's are just angry of not being in power and wants that power. I do think its best for President Assad to stay in power. Only through dictatorship would you fine peace in an arab/muslim country. Look at what's happenning in Libya.

Default-user-icon Adrian (Guest) 10 August 2014, 00:33

to ex-fpm: My friend.. Do you remember 2012 when US engaged the international community against Assad in Syria? Do you clearly remember who opposed that? I will remember you: Russia and China. Now, go an cry to Russia and China my friend, because except that, they obstructing the pace efforts, they did absolute nothing. Did you see Russia sending food and water the the people in needs? Did you see China doing that?

Missing karim- 09 August 2014, 14:38

After months of Iranian lip service here comes the US cavalry to the rescue.

Thumb Mazen 09 August 2014, 16:53

When the Shiites were getting blown up nothing. But then when it's the Christians the whole world wakes up even dp nothing Obama. Typical as if Christians are somehow a higher like form and worth more than Shiites (: they can all go to hell!

Missing panzergen 09 August 2014, 19:42

Yes Muslim communities prospering and breeding like rabbits and feeling entitled in the west. Most Muslims with encouragement from their Islamic religious leaders whether in their own country or in the west breeds like weeds. The Muslims in the western countries think that they can eventually take over the host country by their sheer numbers, and why not? Most western countries have generous social welfare support. With large population, they can wage war in their home countries which results in massive civilian death and suffering.. it seems that a human life in the Muslim world is not given as much importance ... A Life to them is treated like a property to be enjoyed, traded, or destroyed by Muslim men. This is my perspective and view of the Muslims granted that there are exceptions.

Thumb Mazen 09 August 2014, 16:53

karim- go to hell