Amin Gemayel: Respecting National Pact Must Include Sovereignty, Arms, Foreign Policy

W460

Former president Amin Gemayel noted Tuesday that commitment to the National Pact must involve the issues of “sovereignty,” Hizbullah's “arms,” “the state's authority” and Lebanon's “foreign policy.”

“Nowadays, we are hearing a lot about the issue of respecting the National Pact, as if this term is being used for stirring sentiments and overbidding, and unfortunately it is being used in a selective manner,” Gemayel said after talks with ex-president Michel Suleiman in Yarze.

“None of us is against respecting the National Pact, which is part of the constitution and our national traditions and practices, and commitment to the National Pact founded and preserved Lebanon. But respecting the National Pact cannot be arbitrary or a la carte,” Gemayel added, in an apparent jab at the Free Patriotic Movement and its ally Hizbullah.

FPM chief Jebran Bassil has threatened that the FPM would “topple the government” through street protests if the other parties do not heed the movement's demand regarding “partnership” and the National Pact.

“We cannot live together through nice words but rather through sharing responsibility and burdens in the presidency, the government, the parliament and appointments, or else we would be living a lie,” Bassil said.

“We must be partners... We are not your employees, workers or second-class citizens. If you reject our president we will reject your president,” the FPM chief warned.

He also cautioned that if the government “does not abide by the people's interest,” the FPM would “topple it in the street” for “violating the National Pact.”

The FPM, which has the biggest Christian bloc in parliament, has suspended its participation in cabinet sessions and national dialogue meetings over accusations that other parties in the country are not respecting the National Pact.

The 1943 National Pact is an unwritten agreement that set the foundations of modern Lebanon as a multi-confessional state based on Christian-Muslim partnership.

Addressing Prime Minister Tammam Salam, Bassil had recently said that “the son of late PM Saeb Salam must pay great attention when he says that the government is respecting the National Pact when it convenes in the presence of ministers representing only six percent of a main component of the country (Christians).”

Bassil has also warned that the country might be soon plunged into a “political system crisis” if the other parties do not heed the FPM's demands regarding Muslim-Christian “partnership.”

Marada Movement chief Suleiman Franjieh hit back at Bassil last Monday, saying Marada and the other Christian parties in the cabinet “represent a lot more than six percent.”

Comments 8
Thumb lubnani.masi7i 13 September 2016, 17:11

“We must be partners... We are not your employees, workers or second-class citizens. If you reject our president we will reject your president,” the FPM chief warned.

But you are an employee, a worker, and a second class citizen according to hezbollah.

Thumb justice 13 September 2016, 17:54

the sad thing is he does not even know it.

Thumb chrisrushlau 13 September 2016, 18:04

Naharhet cannot say the word: the National Pact gave Christians a six-five assigned-seat advantage in Parliament. The Taef Accord modified this to an even split. My question: who does Mr. Gemayel think agreed to these pacts and accords? Why not ask the people? The answer: bigotry. The cure: law and elections, based on holding everybody responsible. Bigotry is sort of a fatigue, willingness to pretend what people do and think intead of taking the trouble to find out. Like they say, take a chill pill; then go out in the street and meet your neighbors. For instance, why is Hezbullah so effective against the Israeli militias and the Lebanese military so ineffective (at anything)?

Thumb justin 13 September 2016, 18:51

Those hezbollah like mowaten and company that claim they care about the Christians and the FPM are the ones voting you up because you truly depict how they feel and what they want.

Missing humble 13 September 2016, 18:53

We do not want to live in a state run by Iran or Ebola. You can decide to live with all other people from your Shi3a community in any backaged culture you like.

Missing humble 13 September 2016, 19:03

You have destroyed the most important message of Lebanon: "The living together". You also destroyed all hopes of living together in the future. We are not going to accept to live with you and your weapons. So you are most welcome to create your own entity and live by yourself.
Your Shi3aland will be rich, intellectually advanced, modern and highly developed from artistic point of view. We wish you all the best in your partition.
Remember one thing: you are the ones who have already divided our Lebanon.

Missing humble 13 September 2016, 19:14

I wish to remind the Shi3a brothers (if they read History) that it is the Christians who were at the origin of Lebanon, and they were more than happy to share it with their moslem brothers.
I remind our Shi3a brothers that we were NOT GHUZAT as in the video of their leader HA.
I also remind our Shi3a brothers that there are more than 9 million Christians outside Lebanon (whether you like it or not) and that these Christians do count and have among them some presidents and top people all over the world.
May God bless you and help you acquire some common sense.

Missing humble 13 September 2016, 19:23

This is not an answer to my arguments. Your answer is intellectually worth zero which confirms your low IQ and very low level of logic and reasoning.