Report: Christian Four-Party Panel Agrees to Adopt Orthodox Gathering Law

إقرأ هذا الخبر بالعربية W460

The Christian four-party committee on the electoral law on Sunday agreed to endorse the electoral system proposed by the so-called Orthodox Gathering, under which each sect would elect its own lawmakers, LBCI television reported.

The committee took its decision during a meeting held in Bkirki. The four-party panel comprises representatives from the Free Patriotic Movement, the Lebanese Forces, the Phalange Party and the Marada Movement.

LF MP George Adwan has revealed that a meeting was recently held between the LF, Mustaqbal Movement and Phalange Party to coordinate their stances ahead of the meeting of the electoral subcommittee on Tuesday.

He said: “The three parties will propose an electoral draft law based on 50 districts, but they will openly discuss all draft laws.”

“According to the contacts we held, the circumstances are appropriate to reach an agreement over a law other than the 1960 law,” he added.

“We may not reach this agreement during the subcommittee meeting, but I am certain that a new law will enjoy the support of the majority of lawmakers,” Adwan stated.

He stressed that the LF will do “all it can to get rid of the 1960 law,” noting that the whole purpose of the resumption of the subcommittee meetings is to push parliament to convene “as soon as possible for each camp to vote for the electoral draft law of its preference.”

“Each camp will then be made to assume its responsibilities once the vote is done,” he said.

“The people will soon be able to judge the officials based on their actions, not their intentions,” remarked the MP.

The electoral subcommittee is scheduled to convene on Tuesday after the March 14 opposition agreed to Speaker Nabih Berri's proposal of residing in a hotel near the parliament building in downtown Beirut, as a safety precaution.

The opposition alliance had announced following the assassination of Internal Security Forces Intelligence Bureau head Brigadier General Wissam al-Hasan on October 19 that they will be boycotting the national dialogue sessions and the government's work, awaiting Prime Minister Najib Miqati's resignation.

The government approved in August an electoral bill based on proportional representation and 13 districts, but it was met with the opposition's rejection, which deemed it as being tailored to the March 8 majority camp's interests.

Comments 14
Thumb andre.jabbour 07 January 2013, 00:36

Merry Xmas to all my orthodox friends!

Missing thatisit 07 January 2013, 00:38

this is as disgusting as it can get.. further division and a step in the wrong direction.

Thumb Chupachups 07 January 2013, 03:17

Can a neutral person explain this orthodox law to me?

Thumb Chupachups 07 January 2013, 03:18

and why is it a horrible decision?

Missing beirutbastard00 07 January 2013, 11:27

It's not horrible law, but a horrible country.

Both sides are fighting over the districts, not the law. A smal

Missing beirutbastard00 07 January 2013, 11:35

*smaller amount of districts, meaning each district is larger in size, would give more Shia the right to vote for a Christian candidate. Onus camp would win more seats. The smaller size districts would give m14 Christians a better chance at gaining a majority Christian seats.

Hizballah and Amal would not be affected cause they have 100% (pretty much) of the Shia vote. Their interest is making sure their allies win.

The only one against proportionality law is joumblatt. As it stands if joumblatt can get 51% of the vote in the shout, he controls all the seats, including Christian and Sunni seats. The new law would let each vote for their own guy, leaving joumblatt with only 5% of the population (Druze).

I guess. That's what I understood from this mess.

Missing hitech 07 January 2013, 06:18

On December 7 1842, Lebanon was divided into 2 'emarates' between Druze and Maronites and this was one of the biggest mistakes in Lebanon's history. Today they are committing exactly the same mistake, dividing Lebanon among confessional lines. This is the worst law ever; this is taking us 150 years backwards. No... absolutely no. We need unity. Divisions bring nothing but misery.

Thumb Chupachups 07 January 2013, 06:53

hmm i understand now.. yes, i think it's a fair way.. considering that shia and sunnites in terms of population outnumber christians, which means our vote will be diluted....

even though others have said it divides us, i think it is better this way...cos every sect gets a fair go, and is not under the rule of the other.

Thumb Chupachups 07 January 2013, 06:54

and thanks for the explanation.

Missing lqu7 07 January 2013, 08:20

This law should be looked at in 2 lights. One, the back-alley political bickering between Aoun and M14 Christians, which will never end, is that they're playing chicken with each other. Both of their Muslim allies will not accept this law, and that is known, but nevertheless, the Christians have to keep fighting amongst themselves to see who's more "Christian" than the other. As for the second light to look at it, this law further divides an already sectarian and divided nation. No good can come out of this law. If it gets implemented the Christians will feel the benefit early on, but in the long run it will proove disastrous. The only salvation for Christians in Lebanon is SECULAR governance.

Missing lqu7 07 January 2013, 10:35

the_roar, you can roar all you want but you have no bite. You're supporting a regressive electoral law that will be shot down by your allies.

Missing beirutbastard00 07 January 2013, 11:40

What happens in a mixed area? N how many districts is aoun willing to vote for?

Missing beirutbastard00 07 January 2013, 11:48

This law will decide which Christian camp is the strongest, depending on the amount of districts agreed on. And it will diminish the Druze (joumblatt) power in Lebanon. He will never vote for it, and neither side have enough votes to pass their version.

Thumb Chupachups 07 January 2013, 12:35

Lol I'll be waiting to see what happens.. And if u continue with ur promise haha

When are they voting on this ?