White House: No Patriot Missiles in Syria
إقرأ هذا الخبر بالعربية
The White House said Tuesday that NATO would not provide Patriot missile batteries to protect rebel strongholds in Syria, following a request from opposition chief Ahmed Moaz al-Khatib.
Khatib asked for an extension of the umbrella provided by Patriot positions on the Turkish border designed to intercept any missiles fired from the Syrian side, as he took his seat at the Arab League summit in Doha.
"We are aware of the request," White House spokesman Jay Carney said.
"At this time, NATO does not intend to intervene militarily in Syria," Carney said.
"I think that a Patriot missile battery would follow the definition of military assistance," Carney said, adding that Patriot anti-missile batteries in Turkey were for self-defense only.
Carney added however that the White House was constantly reviewing its policies in Syria, which have seen Washington give hundreds of millions of dollars in humanitarian aid but stop short of providing "lethal" military help.
Syrian National Coalition leader Khatib said in Doha that he had asked U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry to extend the Patriot missile protection into northern Syria, and that Kerry had "promised to look into the matter."
"We are still awaiting a decision from NATO on this matter," Khatib said.
A top State Department official was also cool to Khatib's demand for the Syrian opposition coalition, which he heads, to take up Syria's seat at the United Nations, saying that would be up to the U.N.
"We recognize the Syrian Opposition Coalition as the legitimate representative of the Syrian people," Ventrell told reporters. "But in terms of recognition as a government, we're not there yet," he stressed.

josh,why is it in every post you use the term sunni-wahhabi, I think wahhabi will do.your using the same tactic that George bush used when it came to Saddam and weapons of mass destruction,whenever he says Saddam,rest assured its followed by weapons of mass destruction.The absolute majority of Sunni are not wahhabi so stop linking the two together.and please don't sit there and tell me that shia or alawites do not have extremists within their groups or even Christians for that matter,why don't you mention those groups?or you just have a thing for Sunni?

Akkar, its easier to explain whats right with them.... NOTHING!

akkar ,they are only using scare tactics ,i doubt they know anything about them.

Canot disagree with you on this. It seems that us and quatrain wants a man that they can control.

Josh you may be right about the Robles one can find in behavior of Islamic traditional or fundamental behavior. Wahhabism and salafism are two forms that can threaten a society progress and well being. However not a majority of Islamic communities are very moderate. Looks at the Sunnis in Lebanon, in Jordan etc... You cannot reject the moderate majority just because there is are a few fanatics. This is what is happening in Lebanon. The Sunnis are being attacked yet they are the saying we want to live under a strong Lebanese state in respect of all the communities. The fear of Sunnis is being amplified and exploited for local and regional reasons we all know.