السفارة الاميركية:معارك طرابلس تظهر ضرورة قيام الاطراف بحماية لبنان من تداعيات الازمة السورية
Read this story in English
رأت السفارة الاميركية في بيروت أن "العنف في طرابلس يظهر ضرورة قيام الاطراف بحماية لبنان من تداعيات الصراع السوري"، مدينة في هذا الاطار الاعتداء على الجيش.
وأعربت السفارة عبر تويتر، عن قلقها "العميق"ازاء تدهور االوضع الامني في لبنان بما في ذلك طرابلس"، داعية الى ضبط النفس.
وقالت: "العنف في طرابلس يظهر ضرورة قيام الأطراف بحماية لبنان من تداعيات الصراع السوري"، مضيفة أن "الولايات المتحدة تدين استهداف الجيش في المدينة، وتشيد بدوره وتضحياته".
وشهدت طرابلس هذا الاسبوع اشتباكات بين جبل محسن وباب التبانة، أدى الى سقوط عدد من القتلى والجرحى، ما استدعى الى انتشار الجيش في المدينة.
وإذ أكدت السفارة "دعمها لقراري مجلس الامن 1559 و1701 واعلان بعبدا"، استنكرت انخراط حزب الله في الحرب داخل سوريا، معتبرة أن ذلك " يؤدي الى تفاقم التوترات الطائفية ويهدد الأمن".
16:55 ,2013 تشرين الأول 30
179
It is hilarious that some people call my country the "warmonger" when the country to which they seem to have pledged allegiance, namely Iran, is the axis of evil.
18:29 ,2013 تشرين الأول 31
10
Fox news is so awesome, I just love it and I freely admit it. The US will fight as many wars as necessary to keep the evil doers of this world where they belong, underground, deprived of sunshine and oxygen.
18:25 ,2013 تشرين الأول 30
04
The hell with Syria, Iran, saudi, US etc.. These are two neighborhoods in the SAME city, in the SAME country. This is pathetic!
18:26 ,2013 تشرين الأول 30
154
"Les Americains tablent sur l'experience democratique des Libanais sur le pluralisme, sur le dialogue entre les civilisations que l'on retrouve chez nous... Mais malheureusement, au Liban, on ne fait pas la difference: les Americains veulent lutter contre le terrorisme et ne provoquent pas, comme on les accuse, ce que l'on appelle un choc des civilisations. En realite, ce sont les integristes musulmans qui sont hostiles aux autres civilisations aussi bien musulmane, chretienne que bouddhiste; ce ne sont pas les Americains qui appellent au Jihad. "
Et puis les Americains ne sont-ils pas les parrains de Taef? Ceux qui ne misent plus aujourd'hui sur eux, pourquoi l'ont-ils fait par le passe? Pourquoi les Libanais n'ont-ils pas le droit de le faire, de defendre leur souverainete et leur independance? ..."
21:14 ,2013 تشرين الأول 30
113
hezb is the main problem... by being above laws it has only given way to counter reaction by other extremists ... why can hezb bear arms and go freely and not others? are there two laws in lebanon, one for hezbis and one for others? that is the logic hezb has set ....
21:16 ,2013 تشرين الأول 30
510
It baffles me how the United States of America is "concerned" about the deteriorating situation in Lebanon and the rest of the Middle East.
American foreign policy is much to blame for the never-ending fire pit that is our region.
21:37 ,2013 تشرين الأول 30
411
anonymetexasusa
I did not say it was all US doing. I said they are "much to blame" for the chaos and this is very much true.
Mr. Nasrallah's organization should be integrated with the army in some way, however, I do not see how disarming Mr. Nasrallah's organization is going to solve the crisis in Lebanon. I actually believe it will help destabilize the situation more so.
22:14 ,2013 تشرين الأول 30
28
anonymetexasusa
You are getting upset at my use of the word "organization" to describe Mr. Nasrallah's organization?? Do not be petty please, it is not a nice quality.
I did not realize that Mr. Nasrallah's organizations arms is stopping Lebanon from holding elections? Did the issue of their arms stop Lebanon from holding elections a few years ago??
22:31 ,2013 تشرين الأول 30
29
anonymetexasusa
1)I am a American, born and bred. So if you do not mind, please to do not label me anything I am not.
2)What happened to the citizens demonstrating was disgraceful
3)Please do not respond to my question with questions of your own, it shows a lack of debating/thinking skills. I asked you if the arms belonging to Mr. Nasrallah's organization stopped Lebanon from holding elections. Please answer my question.
22:42 ,2013 تشرين الأول 30
102
seems you don't understand hezbi strategy: they are not interested in taking over the state but rather to pull the strings through their allies... if the state does not please them they either block it or take it by force and stall the country... they are the real power now, and they govern, not the state, by the threat of their arms, plain and simple!
if they ever took the gvt by force and impose their laws they know they won't be able to, so they use their allies to do the job and then appear clean!
they are not here to care about lebanon but to obey iran and their agenda.
22:50 ,2013 تشرين الأول 30
29
anonymetexasusa
The name is Mr. Black but maybe this insideman you speak of has equally challenging rhetoric.
I am afraid you did not answer my question. Did the arms belonging Mr. Nasrallah's organization prevent Lebanon from holding elections? Election's that the March 14th camp were the victors mind you.
23:09 ,2013 تشرين الأول 30
29
anonymetexasusa
It's Mr. Black, thank you.
Maybe I need to be more specific with my question, I am sorry but I do not think you understand.
In the 2009 Lebanese General Elections, did the arms of Mr. Nasrallah's organization prevent Mr. Hariri from winning the elections?
23:17 ,2013 تشرين الأول 30
102
with or without elections nasrallah does not care... if any decisions from the state displease them they just block the gvt ... they prefer to appear "democratic" in the eyes of people. they already rule the country with their arms whoever is elected!...
so elections? they don't care as long as their hands are free to do what please them...
don't let yourself deluded and open your eyes...
23:42 ,2013 تشرين الأول 30
49
anonymetexasusa
Is there a love affair you have with Mr. Insideman that I need to know about?
Your answers to my questions are silly. It seems as if you are answering me out of anger.
For the record, I do not agree with everything Mr. Nasrallah's organization does but the sad reality is that Mr. Nasrallah, even amongst his enemies, is still trusted and is known to be a man of his word.
03:21 ,2013 تشرين الأول 31
52
Yes blackie, when Ayadevil told Nasrallah to kill Rafik Hariri, Nasrallah said "yes boss", and he kept his word.
18:42 ,2013 تشرين الأول 31
01
Hello mr. black, you say you a are born and bred American. Just a news bulletin for you fellow American, your country and mine, the USA, considers HA a terrorist organization. As an American, you have a moral obligation to be aligned with the security stances of your government whether you disagree with them or not. Alternatively you are free to ignore your government security stances and side with the enemy. Gotta love freedom, no?
01:15 ,2013 تشرين الأول 31
11
Everybody wants to cry about the US meddling in their affairs, blah blah blah, yet you accept all the foreign aid, disaster relief, food and many other things that the good ole US of A has given to Lebanon for decades. I agree our foreign policy has been weak in that part of the world, but to say that Lebanon can have a even a slight chance of having some form of a democratic government while you have an organization within that wields more strength than the army of Lebanon is just plain laughable.
