U.S. Says 'Combat Advisers' May Battle IS in Iraq, Strikes to Target 'Safe Havens' in Syria

إقرأ هذا الخبر بالعربية W460

The United States plans to strike the Islamic State group in its Syrian strongholds and could send military advisers into combat alongside Iraqi troops, American commanders said Tuesday.

Military leaders warned of a further escalation in their battle against the jihadists just as two branches of the rival Al-Qaeda group called for a united front against the war coalition Washington is building.

U.S. warplanes have been targeting IS jihadists in northern Iraq since August 8, and in recent days hit the militants southwest of Baghdad for the first time, in a significant expansion of the campaign.

Meanwhile, Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel told US lawmakers that plans are being laid to hit targets in Syria, where the IS group is holding hostages and has a stronghold in the city of Raqa.

"This plan includes targeted actions against ISIL safe havens in Syria, including its command and control, logistics capabilities, and infrastructure," Hagel told the Senate Armed Services Committee.

But the U.S. military's top-ranking officer, General Martin Dempsey, told the same hearing the bombing would not match the huge raids that accompanied the start of the 2003 U.S.-led invasion of Iraq.

"This will not look like 'shock and awe' because that is not how ISIL is organized, but it will be persistent and sustainable," Dempsey said, using the term Washington used for its 2003 bombardment.

Dempsey also went further that any U.S. official has gone before in admitting that the military advisers that President Barack Obama has dispatched to bolster Iraqi forces could get involved in combat.

Obama's administration has insisted that his action against the IS extremists is not the start of another U.S. ground war in the Middle East, and that there will be no large-scale American invasion.

But nearly 300 U.S. military advisers are already working with Iraqi government forces, 300 more are on their way and Dempsey refused to rule out their providing "close combat advising."

"To be clear, if we reach the point where I believe our advisers should accompany Iraqi troops on attacks against specific ISIL targets, I will recommend that to the president," Dempsey said.

Dempsey said the advisers are "very much in a combat advisory role" and that there is "no intention" at the moment for them to engage in combat: "I don't see it to be necessary right now."

But he said if there were an "extraordinarily complex" operation planned by Iraqi forces -- such as a bid to recapture the rebel-held city of Mosul -- then advisers could head to the front.

Dempsey said any use of U.S. troops in the field would be approved by Obama, explaining: "He told me to come back to him on a case-by-case basis."

Obama has vowed to expand American efforts and U.S. diplomats are scrambling to put together an international coalition for a "relentless" campaign against the jihadists.

The slow coming together of this alliance drew a fierce reaction from Al-Qaeda's branches in Yemen and in North Africa, who said jihadist forces must also unite against the common threat.

In a joint statement, Al-Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula (AQAP) and Al-Qaeda in the Islamic Maghreb (AQIM) urged their "brothers" in Iraq and Syria to "stop killing each other and unite against the American campaign and its evil coalition that threatens us all."

The Islamic State group began as a successor to Al-Qaeda's Iraqi branch, but has escaped from the group's shadow and clashed with its surrogates in Syria, while claiming leadership of global jihad.

The U.S. strikes against IS fighters in the Sadr al-Yusufiyah area, 25 kilometers (15 miles) from Baghdad, was the first in support of Iraqi forces near the capital.

They bring the number of U.S. air strikes across Iraq to 162. The CIA estimates that the Islamic State organization may be able to field as many as 31,500 fighters -- many of them foreign volunteers.

Iraqi security spokesman Lieutenant General Qassem Atta welcomed the expanded American action, saying the U.S. "carried out an important strike against an enemy target in Sadr al-Yusufiyah."

Sadr al-Yusufiyah lies in the Euphrates Valley, between the militant stronghold of Fallujah and the key battleground of Jurf al-Sakhr, further south. It is one of the closest front lines to Baghdad.

IS militants have seized a swathe of territory in Iraq and Syria, declaring an Islamic "caliphate", committing widespread atrocities and instituting a brutal interpretation of Islamic law.

Western nations and 10 Arab countries, including regional powerhouses Saudi Arabia and Egypt, have agreed to back the U.S.-led campaign, but not all will engage in military action.

Over the weekend, IS militants further upped the stakes in their battle with the West, murdering a British aid worker -- the third Western hostage to be executed on camera.

Comments 7
Thumb lebanon_first 16 September 2014, 18:31

stop giving threats and tonzir. Get on with the strikes already

Thumb LEBhasNOhope 16 September 2014, 18:48

how about all the blood on the hands of the SAA over their entire existence up until this very second? not good enough? too bad! I hope they obliterate them!!!!! it is time these low lives get a taste of their own medicine and what they did to Lebanon and the Lebanese people for so long.

Thumb LEBhasNOhope 16 September 2014, 20:26

speaking from experience? were you even born at that time? Claoun was the idiot that decided to LF were to be disarmed during the middle of a civil while everyone else was still armed. What a genius you worship! also, do you mind elaborating how you think you can ask me to make up my mind while your God supposedly was the only hero that fought them and now is in bed with them? where are our troops? your parroted blank statement you genius love to make is " they left Lebanon so now we should be friends" where they ever held accountable for their crimes? do you think they should be held accountable? how about all the murders prior to them getting kicked out by the seat of their pants? how about them sending michele samaha to start a new civil war? do you need to keep going? look in the mirror and ask yourself your own questions first!

Thumb LEBhasNOhope 16 September 2014, 20:37

yes flamer- because common sense tells you that the syrian regime has Lebanon's best interest at heart and only wants the best for us. They have not continually hurt us in the worst way possible and continue to do so. they have taken responsibility for what they have done and have vowed to work with us and respect as a sovereign nation. Is that the common sense you are referring to? As for the feelings aspect of this, if you don't have those feelings than you are no true Lebanese! As hard as you try to belittle them, they are the core of my Lebanese blood and will always be proud to have them. It's what makes me human which a lot more then can ever be said about you!

Thumb LEBhasNOhope 16 September 2014, 20:38

*than

Thumb LEBhasNOhope 16 September 2014, 21:59

man you must be desperate! The US is bombing ISIS as we speak and the only way you can protect that low life bashar is by claiming that bombing him would allow ISIS to enter Lebanon! The only reason you want bashar to survive is you know for a fact that his demise would mean Claoun's demise and you will sacrifice everything to make sure he remains in power. I hope they obliterate that scum bag and your Claoun lives to be 100. That way the low life can see 4 more presidents elected before his very eyes and he cries after each one of them.

Thumb Tony.Farris 17 September 2014, 00:26

Who care about this rag-tag army SAA!