Palestinian Resolution Fails at U.N. Security Council

إقرأ هذا الخبر بالعربية W460

A Palestinian bid to secure a U.N. resolution setting an end date for the occupation failed to pass a Security Council vote in a move Israel hailed Wednesday as a victory.

China, France and Russia were among the eight countries that voted in favor of the text, but the resolution fell short of winning the nine "yes" votes necessary for adoption within the 15-member council. 

Australia and the United States voted against, and five other countries abstained, including Britain.

The failure to win nine votes also spared Washington from having to wield its veto in a move which would have caused it major embarrassment with its Arab allies. 

The Palestinian-drafted resolution, which was backed by Arab states, would have paved the way for an independent Palestinian state with east Jerusalem as its capital. 

It set a 12-month deadline for Israel to reach a final peace deal with the Palestinians and called for a full withdrawal of Israeli troops from the Palestinian territories by the end of 2017.

The council's rejection of the resolution was hailed by Israel, which said the Palestinians would achieve their dream of statehood only through bilateral negotiations, rather than through "unilateral" moves at the United Nations. 

"The failure of the Palestinian vote at the Security Council should teach the Palestinians that provocations and attempts to force Israel into unilateral processes will not achieve them anything -- quite the opposite," Foreign Minister Avigdor Lieberman said in a statement. 

"This deals a blow to efforts by (Palestinian president) Mahmud Abbas to embarrass and isolate us," said Lieberman's deputy Tzahi HaNegbi, who is known to be a close associate of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu.

But Russia, one of the three permanent members of the Security Council which voted in favor, said the failure to pass the resolution was "a strategic error."

"Russia regrets that the U.N. Security Council did not manage to adopt the draft resolution," said Russia's U.N. envoy Vitaly Churkin after the vote, accusing Washington of "monopolizing" decades of Israeli-Palestinian peace talks and leading them "to a dead end." 

Security Council member Jordan had requested the vote on Tuesday despite opposition from Washington, which said the resolution did not address Israel's security concerns and set arbitrary deadlines.

"This resolution sets the stage for more division, not for compromise," U.S. Ambassador Samantha Power told the council, saying it only addressed the concerns "of just one side." 

"Peace will come from hard choices and compromises that must be made at the negotiating table," she said.

Ahead of the vote, Secretary of State John Kerry had spoken to 13 foreign ministers to explain the U.S. position. 

In the event, the resolution failed to garner nine "yes" votes, meaning Washington was not compelled to use its veto power which could have angered key Arab allies, including partners in the U.S.-led coalition fighting the Islamic State group in Syria and Iraq.

Argentina, Chad, Chile, Jordan and Luxembourg joined China, France and Russia in supporting the resolution.

Lithuania, Nigeria, Rwanda and South Korea abstained, along with Britain. 

Diplomatic sources said Nigeria had been expected to support the resolution and changed its stance at the last minute. 

 

- France votes 'yes' - 

The vote capped a three-month campaign by the Palestinians at the United Nations to win support for the resolution that would have set a timeframe for ending the Israeli occupation.

After the vote, Palestinian envoy Riyad Mansour accused the council of failing to shoulder its responsibilities and vowed to seek other venues to gain recognition.

"The Palestinian people and the world can no longer wait. That message, despite the regrettable outcome today, is especially clear," he said. 

Abbas was to meet with top Palestinian officials at his West Bank headquarters at 1630 GMT on Wednesday to discuss the next steps in their campaign for statehood.

The Palestinians had repeatedly warned that if the resolution failed, they would seek to join international organizations, including the International Criminal Court, where they could sue Israeli officials for war crimes in the occupied territories.

France's envoy said he backed the resolution because of an "urgent need to act" and vowed to continue pressing for a U.N. role in reviving peace talks.

"Our efforts must not stop here. It is our responsibility to try again, before it's too late," said Francois Delattre.

Comments 7
Missing bigjohn 31 December 2014, 15:44

Collaborating with their oppressors for 21 years ONLY hurt the Palestinian cause. The message here is that if the Palestinians can "negotiate" for 21 years for more Israeli colonization, which gave the Israeli criminal entity legitimacy, why not negotiate for 21 more years. Prior to the stupid "Oslo" accords, The Vatican, Greece, Cyprus, Portugal, China, India, and almost ALL African countries did not recognize the racist Zionist state. collaborators are the biggest enemy of a liberation movement. Nelson Mandela preferred to stay in jail and ONLY "negotiated" the END of White Rule.

Missing bigjohn 31 December 2014, 16:01

That is OK. The 2 state solution- separate and totally unequal is dead anyway. In the latest Israeli aggression against Gaza, a poll in the US showed that the majority in the US supported Israel. Off course, this is not surprising since most Americans did not know what Gaza was and the mainstream media panders to Zionist money and influence. But, what was surprising was that more persons of color supported the Natives than the Israeli colonialists as the majority of Whites (persons of European heritage) supported Israeli aggression.

Missing bigjohn 31 December 2014, 16:03

For over 2 centuries, western states supported white rule in South Africa until the 1980's and Mandela was called a "terrorist' by them. In less than 3 decades, persons of color will become a majority in the US. By the beginning of the second half of the 21st century, White (persons of European heritage) control will be non-existent in the world, which will definitly put an end to the racist Zionist state (if not prior to that period). An end to Zionism will be achieved mostly by political and economic means in addition to armed resistance since we are in the 21st century. I will most likely not be alive by then, but my children and their children will be.

Thumb chrisrushlau 31 December 2014, 19:12

The US and Israel never miss an opportunity to miss an opportunity. You have to accept that this futility is deliberate, that WASP racism and its Zionist product are suicide-cults. And then say, "Well, if you insist." To hope and pray that there is some justification for racism and genocide is to insult God and defame human freedom.

Missing helicopter 31 December 2014, 20:50

Who in the Arab world, in your opinion, does not defame human freedom? Anyone?

Missing bigjohn 31 December 2014, 20:53

I Agree with what you said except that they are NOT "suicide cults". There has been very little pressure for Israel to change especially since the Soviet Union Superpower ended, not to mention that the largest and most wealthiest Arab puppet "states" have increasingly used ALL of their wealth and power to stay as hated rulers by waging WAR against their people in trying to silence them. Recently the largest wave of Jewish immigration (about a million) to occupied Palestine came from the former Soviet Union. I remember a poll was taken asking the settlers if they had a choice to go to America would they have gone their instead. 95% of those responded preferred to go to America. Why? Economic reasons off course, which was the main reason they left the Soviet Union to go to a more wealthier Israel, which they were ALL encouraged to go.

Missing bigjohn 31 December 2014, 20:55

Most whites in South Africa, agreed to end Apartheid ONLY because of economic and political isolation faced by the west after the "communist threat" ended in the late 1980's. The Israelis and the WASP's are not suicidal and neither are the Iranians. Off course, there is always the miscalculation of an WMD holocaust anywhere in the world.