UN Report Calls for Disarmament of Hizbullah, Suspension of Its Syria Operations

W460

The UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres renewed the international community’s demand to “disarm” Hizbullah and “halt” its military operations in Syria.

In a semi-annual report published on Friday, Guterres pointed out that the new Lebanese government gives priority to the economic situation, and stressed that “it is also important to embark on preparations of a national defense strategy.”

Guterres stressed that the Lebanese state must “monopolize the possession and use of weapons and the use of force, which is a major issue that falls within Lebanon's sovereignty and political independence.”

“The dominance of weapons outside the control of the state, coupled with the presence of armed militias continue to threaten the security and stability of Lebanon," he said.

Guterres noted that the continued involvement of Hizbullah in the conflict in Syria could “involve Lebanon into regional conflicts threatening its stability as well as the stability of the region.”

"I call on Hizbullah and all other parties concerned to refrain from any military activity inside or outside the country in implementation of the provisions of the Taef Agreement and UN Resolution 1559 of 2004," he said.

Guterres called on countries with close ties to Hizbullah to encourage it to hand over its weapon and transform into a political party.

SourceNaharnet
Comments 3
Missing phillipo 04 May 2019, 13:33

Guterres stressed that the Lebanese state must “monopolize the possession and use of weapons and the use of force, which is a major issue that falls within Lebanon's sovereignty and political independence.”
Unfortunately the Government of the Republic of Lebanon is not in the slightest bit interested in carrying out this request of the UN Secretary General, or even going part of the way and carry out Resolution 1701.

Thumb enterprise 04 May 2019, 14:21

The Lebanese government, army and president are all complicit in Hezbollah terror activities.

Thumb chrisrushlau 06 May 2019, 16:39

If this UN stooge did a little research, he might find out who in particular agreed to the Taef Accord. It wasn't the population of Lebanon acting in free and fair elections creating a representative government. Article 24 of the Constitution prevents that. By the National Pact Christians were assigned, regardless of election results, six elevenths of legislative seats. By the so-called Taef Accord, Christians had their set-aside reduced to half the seats. Do you think anybody beyond a few Christian warlords agreed to this? I can imagine a slave agreeing with his owners to get Sundays off. Actually he'd be agreeing that they have the right to own him.