Moscow Threatens to Veto West's 'Unacceptable' U.N. Resolution on Syria

إقرأ هذا الخبر بالعربية W460

Russia rejects as unacceptable the text of a Western-backed U.N. Security Council resolution on Syria and will use its veto if the draft is brought to a vote later Thursday, a deputy foreign minister said.

"If they decide this (a vote on Thursday) -- knowing that for us the text is unacceptable -- then we will not allow it to pass," Deputy Foreign Minister Gennady Gatilov told the Interfax news agency.

Gatilov added he did not expect there to be a vote as soon as Thursday: "The process of consultations is only just starting and should take some time," he said.

"As a whole, their resolution is unbalanced and foresees that obligations should only be fulfilled by the Syrian government. Practically nothing is said about the obligations of the opposition," he said.

He objected that the resolution links an extension of the mandate of the U.N. mission in Syria -- which Russia supports -- with the introduction of sanctions if the Syrian government does not fulfill certain conditions.

"We will try to move to a constructive text for a possible draft resolution which can reflect the true situation," Gatilov said.

Britain, France, Germany and the United States submitted a draft text that would give President Bashar Assad 10 days to implement U.N.-Arab League envoy Kofi Annan's ceasefire plan or face tough new sanctions.

If Security Council members approve it, the resolution would allow for non-military sanctions under Chapter VII of the U.N. charter if Syrian government forces keep up their offensive on cities.

Negotiations on the Western draft and a rival Russian resolution, which does not mention sanctions, started Thursday in New York. A vote must be held before July 20, when the mandate of the U.N. observer mission in Syria ends.

Russia made clear from the outset that sanctions were a "red line" for veto-wielding Moscow.

"Anything can be negotiated but we do not negotiate this. This is a red line," Russia's deputy U.N. ambassador Igor Pankin told reporters at the Security Council after the first talks among key envoys.

Russia and China have previously twice used their powers as permanent members of the Security Council to veto resolutions which hinted at sanctions.

The draft calls for an "immediate" end to violence by government and opposition forces and demands that President Assad's troops return to barracks in line with the Annan plan and U.N. resolutions passed in April.

The resolution would renew the mandate of the U.N. Supervision Mission in Syria for 45 days, and calls on the mission to take on more political duties, moving away from monitoring a non-existent ceasefire.

U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, on an Asian tour, coordinated with China on moves to support the peace plan drawn up by Annan, who has said the U.N. motion should include "clear consequences" for the regime if it fails to act.

"I had a good discussion on these issues with Chinese Foreign Minister Yang (Jiechi) today and we agreed to do all we can in New York to see the Geneva plan... be implemented," she said on Thursday.

World powers agreed in Geneva last month a plan for a transition in Syria which did not make an explicit call for Assad to quit power. However the West swiftly made clear it saw no role for Assad in a unity government.

"We do look to the Security Council and all its members including Russia to join us in a serious resolution that gives special envoy Kofi Annan what he needs, what he's asking for and imposes real consequences on the regime for continuing to defy its obligations," Clinton said.

The regime and the opposition publicly accept Annan's peace plan, but fighting has raged on and rights monitors estimate that more than 17,000 Syrians have died since March 2011.

Comments 16
Default-user-icon winnie (Guest) 12 July 2012, 19:18

poor russia they remind me of the uk in the mid 1950's, has beens but they don't know it yet.

Missing souri 12 July 2012, 20:29

I promise the Russians that they will be open targets in Syria once the FSA gains more ground on the coast.

Thumb benzona 13 July 2012, 00:13

Look at the Georgian-Russian conflict... despite western support, Saakashvili and his people humiliated and laminated. Russia is the largest country on Earth and its arsenal is definitely superior to America's. They are untouchable... anyway, as I've said before Obama and Putin are just giving us a show here, there's no neo cold war. The only threat for both of them is China. The best example of their friendship is that Soyuz rockets fly US astronauts to the ISS.

Thumb beiruti 12 July 2012, 21:13

Shame on them! Shame on their inhumanity!

Missing allouchi 12 July 2012, 21:20

The Russians will pay dearly for their treachery

Thumb benzona 13 July 2012, 00:14

Thumb up for you, for the second time in a lifetime. Complètement d'accord.

Thumb applepie 13 July 2012, 10:52

Well said FT

Missing mohammad_ca 13 July 2012, 17:33

"weak" and "strong" are very subjective terms as the Arab revolutions have proven. Continue to follow the "strong" like sheep though...good luck, enjoy the wrong side of humanity.

Missing allouchi 13 July 2012, 17:56

FT, 2 wrongs doesn't make it right ya fathal enteh...;)

Missing youssefhaddad 12 July 2012, 21:31

It is a matter of conscience against interests and the interests win again with the Russian regime.
They need to raise oil prices so badly for their economy. The continuing crisis in Syria and the Iranian involvement are sure to continue creating a climate of uncertainty in the Middle East, thus an increase in oil prices.
The Russian Putin regime will ultimately pay dearly for its shortsighted policies towards Syria.

Default-user-icon MUSTAPHA O. GHALAYINI (Guest) 12 July 2012, 23:02

are the russians complete idiots??????strange

Thumb jcamerican 12 July 2012, 23:34

I cannot stop laughing at these ridiculous comments about Russia. Who has conscience? When the christian lebanese were being slaughtered, who paid attention to them. The Russians will ultimately pay dearly? @souri You want to attack the russians? Deal with Bashar first then open your mouth, don't make promises. I am sure the syrians were promised they will topple the regime in a month or two.

Default-user-icon .. 1978, 1981, 1989 .. (Guest) 13 July 2012, 00:03

jcamerican
When the Christian lebanese were being slaughtered, the USSR did what it is doing now stalled and stalled and then stalled some more then it threatened to veto any resolution against the Syrian army.

Thumb benzona 13 July 2012, 00:14

complètement d'accord.

Default-user-icon Vlado Bossanga (Guest) 13 July 2012, 02:37

Why do some keep fabricating names like Moscow, China, Russia, Beijing that represent virtual nobodies? I have never heard of them ever. Have you? I know the UK, the US, France... So let's just stick to these real countries and shrug off the other fabricated ones. This is no time for kidding around.

Default-user-icon saibu yesufu (Guest) 13 July 2012, 02:37

@ benzona or whatever u call urself,where did you read that the Russia has superior weapon to the American?you must be an illiterate,so you thought the west should have been involved in Russia vs georgia war?is America behind the massacre in syria?you uncolonised fool