Egypt Panel Agrees to Keep Islamic Principles in Charter

إقرأ هذا الخبر بالعربية W460

An Egyptian panel was rushing through on Thursday approval of a new constitution at the center of a political crisis pitting the Islamist president against his opposition, which has threatened new protests.

By late afternoon, the constituent assembly, which has been boycotted by liberals and Christians, had approved almost one-fifth of 234 articles, including a unanimous decision to retain Islamic law as the main source of legislation.

"We want a constitution we agree on," said assembly chief Hossam al-Gheriani, adding that the panel had been "awaiting" boycotting members even as it went to the vote.

President Mohamed Morsi, meanwhile, is expected to give an address on the crisis at 1700 GMT, the official Al-Ahram newspaper reported.

The opposition, which has mobilized unprecedented rallies since Morsi assumed broad powers last week, accuses the president and allies in the constituent assembly of railroading the charter through for a quick referendum.

The charter will replace the one suspended after president Hosni Mubarak's overthrow in early 2011.

Once it has been approved by the panel, it will be sent to Morsi, who must call a referendum on it. One of the president's advisers and panel member Essam al-Erian said this might happen within two weeks.

The opposition mostly disagreed with the rushed manner in which the assembly was operating and opposes some of of the draft charter's provisions on rights and freedoms.

Christians objected to an article, yet to be approved, that seeks to narrow the meaning of "the principles of Islamic law" to the tenets of Sunni Muslim jurisprudence.

Heba Morayef, Human Rights Watch Egypt directors, said some of the draft article provisions freedom of expression and religion resemble a "penal code."

"Some of the provisions are penal code provisions. You don't list all the things that you are not allowed to do, you're supposed to set up the rights and limitations," she said.

Particularly worrisome was the limitation of religious freedom to followers of Abrahamic religions, Morayef said, which would exclude minorities such as Bahais that have been persecuted in Egypt.

"They have added language that is problematic to freedom of expression, you cannot 'insult a human', which is very broad. It can be used to censor criticism of the president," she said.

Morsi's decree, described by the opposition as dictatorial, stripped courts of the right to annul the controversial constituent assembly ahead of an expected court ruling on Sunday.

It shields Morsi's decisions from review by the judiciary, which Morsi and his movement believe retains Mubarak-era appointees who are inimical to Islamists.

The top Cassation Court has suspended work to protest the decree, which will expire once the constitution is ratified.

Morsi and his supporters argue that delaying the constitution, which would be followed by parliamentary elections to replace the Islamist-dominated house dissolved by a court earlier this year, would delay democratic transition.

The assembly, dominated by Islamists, had announced on Wednesday it would vote on the charter the following day, to the shock of opposition groups holding out that Morsi would try to reconcile after a massive Tuesday rally.

Morsi allowed the assembly a further two months after its mid-December deadline to finish the charter, making the quick vote even more of a surprise to the opposition.

Opposition groups said they would hold marches on Friday to Cairo's Tahrir Square, where dozens of protesters say they will remain camped out until Morsi reverses his decree.

Minor skirmishes persisted on Thursday between some protesters and police near the square. At least three protesters have been killed in country-wide unrest since the decree.

The president insisted in a magazine interview on Wednesday that he will surrender his controversial new powers once a new constitution is in place, hoping to assuage the growing anger two years after a democratic uprising overthrew Mubarak.

"If we had a constitution, then all of what I have said or done last week will stop," he told the U.S. Time magazine. "I hope, when we have a constitution, what I have issued will stop immediately."

Comments 9
Thumb lebanon_first 29 November 2012, 16:24

7th century legislation for the 21st century? nice going

Thumb lebanon_first 29 November 2012, 16:51

at this rate, it will take them 300 years to reach the "sorry" state our fledgling democracy is in. Despite all our problems, Lebanon is so much ahead

Missing vaclav_havel 29 November 2012, 17:11

Mais les gars c'est très facile de critiquer les révolutions arabes!
Pour autant si nous prenons un peu de distance nous comprendrons que cette attitude, certes archaïque, mais complètement normale : Il y a eu un régime dictateur ou presque, pendant plusieurs décennies, en Égypte comme ailleurs , où le peuple, du moins la majorité, vivait en dessous du seuil de pauvreté, privé de liberté (notamment politique) et de justice. Vous croyez quoi? ils vont devenir séculaire, laïque et démocratique immédiatement?
bien sûr que non, c'est malheureusement la religion qui est le soutien du peuple "pauvre", et oui c'est l'"opium du peuple". Maintenant qu'ils se sont débarrassés courageusement de leur(s) dictateur(s), ils vont apprendre, au fur et à mesure, la laïcité, la démocratie, la liberté et d'autres principes...

Thumb geha 29 November 2012, 17:20

totally agree. democray is a process that needs time to be learnt then applied.

Missing vaclav_havel 29 November 2012, 18:03

Tu sais les occidentaux étaient pires! pendant, je dirais des siècles et non des décennies, ont vécu dans l’obscurantisme et l'ignorance due à un aveuglement religieux. La religion représentée par les papes et les rois rendait inimaginable toute démocratie et tout avancement humain! il y a eu des révolutions sanguinaires et vous connaissaient la suite...
Messieurs, tout humain, par le fait qu'il est "humain" tend vers le mieux et donc vers plus de justice, plus de liberté, plus de tolérance, c'est Socrate, Jésus et Bouddha qu'ils le disent...
Les arabes ont une très belle civilisation, et ont déjà été pionniers du progrès entre le XIIIe et le Xe siècles.

Missing vaclav_havel 29 November 2012, 18:11

donc cette phrase "la démocratie ce n'est pas pour les arabes" est complètement fausse, le passé est un contre exemple et le futur le prouvera!
néanmoins, je suis tout à fait d'accord qu'on est féodale nous libanais, c'est un problème qu'on doit résoudre.
Messieurs nous sommes des arabes, et moi personnellement je suis fier de l'être! je suis chrétien Libanais, j'ai une identité, j'ai mes tradition et ma culture mais je suis arabe également, je suis fier de cohabiter avec mes frère musulmans et pourquoi pas juifs, je suis fier du Coran qui est un livre extraordinaire, je suis fier du prophète... il est inapproprié de séparer Libanais et Arabe, je dirais même c'est ridicule!
Si tu aimes le Liban je te conseille humblement de lire Gibran Khalil Gibran et tu comprendras ce que ça veut dire être Libanais et Arabe!

Missing Perestroika 29 November 2012, 18:50

Je suis d'accord que ce n'est pas "une insulte" de ne pas être démocratique. Je n'ai jamais dis l'inverse! c'est un système qui, à mon avis a beaucoup d'inconvénients, mais, toujours à mon avis, reste le meilleur de ce qui existe actuellement. On peut bien évidemment penser à l'améliorer ou à le remplacer par un autre encore meilleur.
"La démocratie n'est pas pour les arabes" => j'ai cru comprendre que les Arabes ne méritent pas la démocratie ( en gros qu'ils sont inférieurs aux autres peuples pour l'avoir), mais je pense que tu voulais dire que les arabes méritent d'avoir un système du moins aussi bon que la démocratie mais différent. dans ce cas là il faut bien utiliser son imagination... c'est un long débat comme tu le dis.

Default-user-icon MUSTAPHA O. GHALAYINI (Guest) 30 November 2012, 00:17

je ne peux pas concevoir une democratie qui fonctionne sans separation religion de l' etat, democratie religieuse?? c 'est de la foutaise, pour marier mon fils il faut aller a chypre?????????//c' est pas rigolo ca??le mariage civile n 'est pas obligatoire,c est pas un peche ,on n'a pas besoin du grand manitou.

Missing peace 30 November 2012, 12:41

no difference with iran that also has islamic principles as a law... why are M8 people sooooooo angry after egypt and praise iran which by nature is an islamic regime? LOL
double M8 hypocrit standards as usual...