Mufti al-Shaar Confirms Receiving Death Threats, Will Not Return to Lebanon

Please be fair and look at the record of assasinations.

i know which list you're thinking of, but you can also look at this one
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_Hezbollah#Assassinations_of_Hezbollah_Officials

M8 members didn't get death threats... Anyone kneeling before A$$ad doesn't receive death threats.

Wesam 7assan recieved death threats from aoun and charl ayoub, not to mention the incitement in ur media outlets 24/7.The day is coming when people will start shooting back at you, nd the day that you find fundamentalists at your doors is close, thanks to your arrogance, terrorism and idiocy

lol you guys talk out of your rears and throw out all sorts of random accusations.
every time i ask you guys to back your claims with anything tangible you disappear and downvote, that's the best you can do :)

prove me wrong, please i beg you, show me any evidence that aoun sent death threats to wissam al hassan.
.
.
.
.
.

that's what i thought, good night :)

"who HASEN'T received death threats?" -> all your M8 friends... :)

strange isn t it? no need to ask where they come from....

@ Mowaten...You wanna know why your wrong brother, because M14ers "feel" it. Thats all the evidence anyone needs case closed! M14 "feelings" when again! Have a nice day

oh so now the mufti of the town which sends islamist fighters to syria is beyond suspicion, and you feel shocked when i say that, but when a unidentified bomb explodes and m14 accuses the lebanese government and syria without the slightest proof you dont question it for a second?
lol come on

oops perestroika/vaclav havel, you just gave the proof that you use multiple accounts :)

were you upvoting yourself and you forgot which account you were logged on when you commented? how pathetic is it to do such things?

Nasralla is the one sending fighters, he has even admitted it!

funny that vaclav havel comment got deleted, it was damning evidence that he is the same person behind the "perestroika" username.

naharnet moderator are you in this with him?

and mohammad habboub you're cute but if you want to use nasrallah's words at least quote him properly, dont distort them to make them say what you want. he said some HA fighers who live in border villages, alongside 30,000 lebanese, are defending themselves from rebel attacks.

you know what? i just checked and indeed he was opposed to the creation of sunni militias in tripoli, so he probably had nothing to do with the salafi fighters.
i'm happy to recognize i spoke too hastily and i was wrong, i take back my previous comment and apologize to Sheikh Malek (if he reads that, which i doubt ;))

Thank you mowaten :)

habibe enta.
bawse.

And your sadness is coming from damascus. Again it is all sectarian and you are but a mere racist anti suni nazi. Yes you will wake up to the reality that sunis are the majority in the region and they are getting armed, the days of militia Ha hegemony are ending, get real and make peace.

HA never seeked war against the sunnis, HA is fighting israel and is the only one giving real help to the palestinians who are... oh snap! sunnis!

now if some extremist currents who do not represent the sunni mainstream, far from that, are under whhabbi influence that says shiaas are takfiris and must be killed, and they refuse to sit at the dialogue table with HA, and they keep taking provoking stances, then HA should arm even more, to defend itself.

Mowaten. It is not only the salafists that are pissed with HA. The moderate sunni is also pissed. He's not picking up a gun and fighting HA. But that doesn't mean the only people pissed at HA are the salafists and because they think shia are takfiris. And as long as HA infringes on the sunni as they have done. The sooner they will pick up guns. And when that happens my friend. Things do not look good for either side. Especially the shia in levant. No matter how much they arm. I mean really. Look at assad. A minority will have a hell of a time holding back a majority. O let's not rush to war and think it will be a walk in the park for HA. On the contrary. It will be their doom. (HA not the shia.)

Happines comes when the enemy within is elminated. M14 + M8 = same crap

"as long as HA infringes on the sunni as they have done"
please arzak, be specific about that claim.
this kind of rhetoric is constantly in the mouths of the future movement speakers (and others like assir) yet they never say specifically how HA does that. is it the plastic toy gun which said "kill kill aisha" ?
as long as i'm concerned HA is built around one objective: fight israel, and that's their only focus. if sunnis let themselves be incited against HA for whatever reason, then yes there would be dark days ahead, but what should HA do? what are m14 asking for from HA? disarm? that's not possible, khalas get over it change the subject. or stay stuck on that until things boiling point

things reach* the boiling point

i sense you tried to make a point there mohammad, i give you a C for the effort (you could try a little harder) and an F for relevance.

i was reading the quran when i killed kennedy! didnt your m14 friends tell you that?

Chrisruslau, if shiites are Muslims, then why do you say Ya Ali, Ya Hussein, Ya Mahdi, Ya Zahra when the quran clearly states that is shirk and a mushrik can NOT be a Muslim? Do you consult the quran EVER? Of course you dont, only when you are trying to proove a point to a Muslim, then all of a sudden you use the quran. Secondly, you are wrong about statistics. Shiites in lebanon are today about 40%, Muslims about 25 %, Christians about 25 % and druze about 5% with the remaining 5% given to minorites and a couple % more or less for the religions i mentioned above. Thirdly, how can you talk about who Muslims side with when shiites themselves have sided with christians? Have you forgotten that shiites are allied with FPM (Aoun) and Marada (Franjieh) and the ssnp which is a majority christian party?

realist, shiites dont know much about husseins (RA) teachings. His teachings was that of the sahaba (RA), like that of his father (RA) and logicly the teachings of his grandfather prophet Mohammad(SAW). What shiites have on the other hand is lies made up by Abdallah bin saba la3nat Allah 3ale who was the person who founded shiaism, and they have the lies of zoroastrism, and lies of their ayatollahs, they call it the teachings of Ali (RA) and Hussein (RA) and Ahlulbayt (RA) when in reality its the teachings of satan.

pizza, the Shia are %100 true Muslims and "takfir" others just because there are some very minor differences is also haram...Shia and Sunnis are both Muslims...

Flamethrower, that is not enough to be a Muslim. Believing in the quran means to believe in it as it is, not to change the verses to suit the belief of shiaism. On paper, the shia "believe" in the quran, but not in reality as they claim matam (beating oneself) is allowed due to a verse about prophet jacob (AS) or deny that the prophets (SAW) wifes (RA) were ahlulbayt even though they are specifcly referred to as ahlulbayt in the Quran just to give you some examples of how claiming to believe in the quran in order to "fit in" in muslim societies is not the same as actually believing in it.

A muslim believes in la ilaha illa allah, which include believing there is nobody like God and that we cant invoke anyone other than him etc, yet shiites break this rule by referring to their 12 imams as infallible (giving them qualities that only God has) and by invoking them. Moreover, a Muslim believes in Muhammad rasoul allah, which includes believing that Muhammad (SAW) was the final prophet, yet again shiites play around and claim that after prophethood, God sent imamah which is like prophethood but with a diffirent name! All of this is kufur, shirk and nifaq according to Islam. So no, shiites are not muslims according to Islam and God's words in the quran. It is not about radical teachings, its about the fundemantals of what islam is.

Most Muslims arent aware of the beliefs of shiites, they think the biggest diffirence is that shiites hate the sahaba (RA) when in reality thats one of the smallest diffirences. Islam is what exists in the Quran and the quran refutes the beliefs in shiaism and condemns it.

To Muslims who are confused about shiites, just enter this following site and enter the articles section and read those articles from every subject listed and see for yourself. Its a back up site of the famous ahlelbayt website which was dedicated to exposing shiaism by regular Muslims (not salafis or any extremists).

Go ahead and learn:

http://www.schiiten.com/backup/AhlelBayt.com/www.ahlelbayt.com/articles.html