Kerry Says Arab Nations Offered to Pay for Syria Strike

إقرأ هذا الخبر بالعربية W460

An international coalition for action against Syria is growing, Secretary of State John Kerry told U.S. lawmakers Wednesday, adding that Arab nations had even offered to pay for any strikes.

"We are building support with ... other countries, among them the Arab League," Kerry said, as the U.S. administration tried to sell its plan for military action to punish Syria for its use of chemical weapons.

"Specific countries that have talked in terms of acting" were "Saudi Arabia, the Emirates, Qataris, the Turks and the French."

The move comes after an alleged chemical weapons attack on a Damascus suburb last month, which the U.S. says killed 1,400 people.

The United States had reached out to more than 100 countries already and 57 had agreed chemical weapons were used, and 37 of them had said so publicly, Kerry told a House committee.

President Barack Obama has insisted that the regime of Syrian President Bashar Assad's regime has crossed a red line against the use of chemical weapons and should be punished and his military capability degraded.

"Thirty-one countries or organizations have stated publicly or privately that the Assad regime is responsible for this attack, and that was before our evidence package was put together," Kerry said.

"And 34 countries or organizations have indicated that if the allegations prove to be true, they would support some form of action against Syria."

He even suggested the United States had too many offers of help as he sought for a second day to persuade U.S. lawmakers to back Obama's plan for limited missile strikes against the Syrian regime.

"A number of them have asked to be part of a military operation," he said.

"The Turks, a NATO country, have condemned it, pinned it on Assad, asked to be part of an operation.

"The French have volunteered to be part of an operation. There are others who have volunteered. But frankly ... we got more volunteers that we can use for this kind of an operation," Kerry said.

"With respect to Arab countries offering to bear the cost and to assist, the answer is profoundly yes, they have. That offer is on the table," Kerry, adding it was "quite significant."

"Some of them have said that if the United States is prepared to go do the whole thing the way we've done it previously in other places, they'll carry that cost. That's how dedicated they are to this."

But he stressed: "Obviously, that is not in the cards and nobody is talking about it, but they are talking about taking seriously getting this job done."

He was appearing before the House Foreign Affairs committee on the second day of the administration's blitz on Capitol hill to persuade lawmakers to approve limited military strikes against Syria.

In a sign of public opposition to the plan, anti-war demonstrators held up red-stained hands behind Kerry's head in a silent protest as he spoke.

Lawmakers are now drafting a resolution to go before Congress which would give the U.S. administration a 60-day deadline for military intervention, which could be extended once for 30 more days. It would also bar any American boots on the ground.

Asked if the time limit was acceptable to administration, Kerry said it would be preferable to have "a trigger in there" if Assad used chemical weapons again.

He indicated that a move to give the White House a further 60 days every time such arms were used would be acceptable.

Comments 9
Thumb Maxx 04 September 2013, 22:58

"Killing poor people is patriotic", quoth the sign over Kerry's shoulder. Well, that seems to be the Baschar slogan...

Thumb bustany 04 September 2013, 23:34

"Some of them have said that if the United States is prepared to go do the whole thing the way we've done it previously in other places, they'll carry that cost. That's how dedicated they are to this." Kerry Says.
Now: Doing the whole thing?? Translation: killing all Christians and Alwaites.. hmmm who do you think will pay for that?... hmmm Think again? yes... You got it.

Thumb LEBhasNOhope 04 September 2013, 23:50

didn't you once tell me that you wish all the Palestinians in the camps would be gassed? and now you want to buy them houses? of course you can easily deny it that as your comments were deleted along with your account but you know that I know and that is good enough for me.

http://www.naharnet.com/stories/en/75281

Thumb LEBhasNOhope 05 September 2013, 01:11

Rbaker- I never said that and never will but if it makes you feel better to lie to yourself, go right ahead.

Default-user-icon SaidaStyle (Guest) 05 September 2013, 17:40

Flamethrower, so if a palestinian or syrian fires a rocket then all of his people must be gassed but when a lebanese does it then not all lebanese should be gassed? Lol. How about gassing every criminal who harms peopl physicly regardless of nationality and leave civilians and racism out of it? Most of the criminals in lebanon are lebanese after all.

Default-user-icon Derb (Guest) 04 September 2013, 23:56

"With respect to Arab countries offering to bear the cost''
wow I did not know that they were so much concerned about protecting international law. I bet there is no 'hidden' agenda at all

Missing patomk 05 September 2013, 20:12

well,russia and iran and hezbolla doesnt respect the international law at all.if they think that the opposition is responsible why didn't they try to push the UN to do somethin??

Missing hb9z 05 September 2013, 04:24

if you consider that your enemy's job is to kill you then thats in the order of things but when your "brotherly neighbour" kills you then thats NOT in the order of things ? you agree??
assad was trusted in keeping the peace in lebanon since 1976 and the arabs PAID for it and instaed he used lebanon as a hostage and endlessly tried to control all parts of the government... and made factions fight each other ...do you recall the amal hizballah camp fights? when they tore each other under the eyes of syria...how he bombed achrafieh for 100 days ? killed scores of opponents, killed hariri....? how can anyone defend him?

Thumb ironlikelion 05 September 2013, 09:34

actually, in ALL arab-israeli conflicts, 91,000 arabs and 25,000 israelis have been killed...