Kerry's 'Unbelievably Small' Syria Strike Comment Slammed

إقرأ هذا الخبر بالعربية W460

U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry was under fire Monday for saying that a proposed U.S. military strike on Syria would be "unbelievably small."

The comment came as Kerry ended a whirlwind diplomatic offensive in Europe aimed at whipping up support abroad for U.S. military action against the Damascus regime, accused of using chemical weapons against its people.

"We're not going to war. We will not have people at risk in that way," Kerry told a news conference in London after talks with British Foreign Secretary William Hague.

Washington has been trying to convince its allies that Syrian President Bashar Assad must be held accountable for his alleged use of chemical arms in an August 21 attack near Damascus.

Kerry offered assurances that any U.S. action would be "a very limited, very targeted, very short-term effort that degrades his capacity to deliver chemical weapons without assuming responsibility for Syria's civil war."

"That is exactly what we're talking about doing -- unbelievably small, limited kind of effort," he said in London.

But U.S. lawmakers, who are due to begin voting this week on whether to give President Barack Obama a green light to launch such strikes, lambasted his comments.

Influential Republican Senator John McCain, a long-time friend of Kerry's who has backed the Obama administration's plan, called the comment "unbelievably unhelpful" in a message on his Twitter account.

McCain has been trying to rally Republican support around the plan, with the White House facing an uphill battle to get it through Congress, particularly the House of Representatives.

House Intelligence Committee Chairman Mike Rogers, who also strongly favors a strike on Syria, said of Kerry's comments: "I don't understand what he means by that."

"That's a very confusing message -- certainly a confusing message to me that he would offer that as somebody who believes this is in our national security interest," he told MSNBC.

Deputy State Department spokeswoman Marie Harf said, however, that Kerry was just trying to allay fears that the United States was preparing for major action.

"Secretary Kerry was merely responding to any fears of a massive military operation with boots on the ground like in Iraq or Afghanistan," Harf said in an email to Agence France Presse.

"He has affirmed again and again that when the United States military takes action, the Assad regime will feel it. The U.S. military doesn't do pin-pricks, but the Secretary was making clear that a military action can be both tailored and limited."

Kerry was likely to be quizzed about his comments late Monday when he was due to appear at a classified House briefing right after arriving back in Washington from London.

Comments 9
Thumb bustany 09 September 2013, 20:51

I think Syria-Russia got you this time Mr. Kerry (Was not a name for LaVouch Kirry????)Anyhow, the USA-Israelis plan to kill all the Christians in the ME seems to be stalled again by the force of human. Syria managed again to survive the Syrian Christians as it did during the 1975-1990 Lebanese civil war. At the time, Kissinger, USA secretary of State then, suggested that the best solution for Israelis stability is to get rid of the ME Christian community.

Thumb Maxx 09 September 2013, 21:23

Get off the crack buddy; it's not only making you ultra paranoid, but is making you spout out stupidities. Kissinger stepped down as Secretary of State in 1977. So the same man that last year said that Israel's demise will come in 10 years (http://joemiller.us/2012/10/henry-kissinger-in-10-years-israel-will-cease-to-exist/) could not have had much influence on U.S. foreign policy during the Lebanese Civil War. Second, you would profit well from attending late night English Language courses. As for your French (La Vache Qui Rit?) - you're hopeless.

Thumb bustany 09 September 2013, 21:43

The facts remained,
1. Kissinger was the broker of cease-fire between Egypt, Syria on one side and Israelis on the other side. Kissinger made it clear, to the people who listen and read history, that the Christians in the ME is the biggest problem for the Israelis and suggested an elimination of their independent political weight in Lebanon. Small people like you call themselves MAXX show how much of enlargement procedures you need to match NORMAL people. As a matter of fact, my president call people like you and your Gulf supporters as half-men you are!

Thumb arzak-ya-libnan 10 September 2013, 06:45

Yes. People get it right. In order to protect the Lebanese Christians Assad had to attack and slaughter them. From zahle to ashrafiyeh to the attack on the Baabda palace. These were all necessary. He needed to kill Christians to protect Christians. What is do hard to understand. Elementary my friends. Bustany tops his class in "repeating propaganda 101".

Thumb Maxx 09 September 2013, 21:09

Oh, he was referring to the strikes. Could've fooled me Mr. Kerry, with that limp attitude to tackling the continuous death in Syria.

Default-user-icon GKG (Guest) 09 September 2013, 22:10

Bustany. You are probably a Syrian born Christian. So Assad family saved the Christian in Syria? You should learn 2 things: 1.Assad probably killed more Christians in Lebanon than anybody in the history of this country. 2.Christ most essential teaching, that made him a universal figure, is the belief in the liberty of man. The concept of individual liberty was revolutionary and changed the society, political, socially and economically. As such, living in Souria Al Assad, you are not free, and hence not Christian.

Thumb bustany 10 September 2013, 02:48

Oh man, I wish I can meet you in person. I wonder how "smart" people like you will look like?? The facts remained: the only Christian community was saved despite a civil war in the ME is the Lebanese one. Lebanese territories was occupied tightly by Assad, the father, and Baath. Conclusion?

Default-user-icon GKG (Guest) 10 September 2013, 07:47

What you refer at as civil war was for most of its part a war between the Syrian army and Christians militias defending their country. Conclusion?

Default-user-icon Larry (Guest) 10 September 2013, 10:49

As an American reading this paper and comments, I get a headache trying to count and discern all of the factions, clans, tribes, parties, religious groups, and ethnic and natioality groups in your country. You all hate eachother, and have no national identity. You all hate hezbollah, but despite the fact everyone has an ak47, you do nothing to resist it. Instead, you blame Israel for your problems, and focus on this shaba farms(which Israel doesn't want but cant figure who it belongs to). You will destroy yourself unless you can begin thinking of yourself as Lebanese and nothing else.