Suleiman Discloses How All Parties Agreed on Baabda Declaration, Vows to Refuse Term Extension

إقرأ هذا الخبر بالعربية W460

President Michel Suleiman noted Thursday that "those who are currently objecting" against the Baabda Declaration "will start calling for its implementation in the future,” stressing that he would leave office even if the presidential vote was not held on time.

“Believe me, those who are currently objecting against the Declaration will start calling for its implementation later on,” Suleiman said in an interview with the al-Nashra magazine that is published by the Beirut Bar Association.

The president noted that the Baabda Declaration was endorsed “after some fighters headed from northern Lebanon to Syria,” adding that “the army commander was asked during a cabinet session to prevent the smuggling of any arms and arrest any gunman even if that required force … and everyone agreed on that.”

“But afterwards, some parties announced that they do not approve of this Declaration and some parties even claimed that it was not discussed around the dialogue table,” Suleiman lamented.

The president, however, pointed out that “the dialogue session was fully audio-recorded and that includes the statements of everyone who took part in it,” revealing that all parties had suggested “verbal” and “political” amendments during the meeting.

“The Declaration was then adopted and it was endorsed by the international community before we heard remarks that 'we are still discussing the Baabda Declaration',” Suleiman added.

"Four hours and 20 minutes into the meeting, Speaker Nabih Berri recited the resolutions and the amendments, and despite all this, it is being said that the Declaration was not discussed and that the paper was only distributed to the conferees," Suleiman complained.

The Baabda Declaration was issued in June 2012 following a national dialogue session and it calls for neutralizing Lebanon from the policies of regional axes except for issues related to Arab consensus and the Palestinian cause.

Turning to the issue of the upcoming presidential vote, Suleiman said: “The presidency did not start with me and it will not end with my departure and I refuse to consider as a democratic act any attempt to prevent quorum" needed in parliament to elect a new president.

“My ambition at the end of this term of office is to deliver the departure speech and I have given the decision to start preparing it here at the Baabda Palace, in order to hand over the post to a normally elected president,” Suleiman added.

“If, God forbid, the elections do not take place, there will also be a departure speech,” the president announced.

Separately, the president called for “implementing the Taef Accord before demanding to change it,” expecting “a period of stability in Lebanon and the region when the storm ends in Syria.”

Comments 11
Thumb eli-g 27 February 2014, 17:43

A true statesman indeed. Lebanon needs more politicians like you Mr. president.

Thumb _mowaten_ 27 February 2014, 18:14

indeed, he's one of the good ones. i guess former army generals make good statesmen ;)

Thumb _mowaten_ 27 February 2014, 19:11

last time this happened and you accused HA, the guys got caught and turned out to be takfiris. so please zip it, your daily baseless accusations only serve to discredit you.

Thumb _mowaten_ 27 February 2014, 19:34

exactly what i'm saying, those who actually did it that we know about are takfiris. if you want to suspect someone for a nearly identical event, you can suspect them. that would have a basis, since we know they did it right before. that's if you have any sense of honesty and logic.

Thumb _mowaten_ 27 February 2014, 20:08

habibi you might be gullible enough to fall for it, but to every one with a brain it was clear they tried to make it look like it was HA.

the most basic objective of terror attacks is to create confusion, divide people and stir tensions. if they could make believe that HA attacked the presidential palace, it would have created a big rift between the president and HA, and possibly a battle between the army and HA. the takfiri dream. but thank god most people are more intelligent than you and saw clear through their little game.

and ps: HA doesnt need an alibi, there is absolutely nothing that points to them. they dont need an alibi more than mustaqbal do for instance. yesterday you were lecturing about the right of islamists in roumieh to a trial, but today you forgot all about due procedures, you just "select" who your "guilty" ones are and point you dirty finger without proof, evidence, or even a rational explanation.

Missing VINCENT 27 February 2014, 20:26

IRAN. Need I say more?

Thumb _mowaten_ 27 February 2014, 22:32

it depends.. you named a country, if your intention was to give a country name then no, you need not say more.

Missing VINCENT 27 February 2014, 23:31

How about KSA?

Thumb _mowaten_ 27 February 2014, 22:31

"trying to rush away forgot his ID"

ROFL. that sounds super pro. i bet they train bomb experts to take their IDs with them and carefully remove them from their wallet and place them neatly on the floor. so that when they run they can forget it there. i bet they also train to pick up flowers to dodge sniper bullets.

Thumb _mowaten_ 28 February 2014, 10:23

what was it exactly in my comment that made you report it? the spanking you got was too loud?

Thumb _mowaten_ 28 February 2014, 10:25

what was it exactly in my comment that made you report it? the spanking you got was too loud?