Netanyahu Says Israel Not Bound by Iran Deal, Will 'Defend Itself'

إقرأ هذا الخبر بالعربية W460

Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said Tuesday after world powers reached a historic nuclear deal with Iran that Israel was not bound by it and signaled he remained ready to order military action.

Netanyahu's harsh criticism of the agreement came after he warned for months that the deal being negotiated would not prevent Iran from acquiring nuclear weapons.

While analysts say unilateral military action by Israel seems unlikely for now, Netanyahu and other officials have kept the option on the table.

"Israel is not bound by this deal with Iran, and Israel is not bound by this deal with Iran because Iran continues to seek our destruction," Netanyahu told reporters before a meeting of his security cabinet.

"We will always defend ourselves."

Netanyahu called the nuclear deal a "historic mistake", and the accord drew strong criticism from across the Israeli political spectrum.

"We did commit to preventing Iran from acquiring nuclear weapons, and this commitment still stands," Netanyahu said earlier on Tuesday, even before the agreement was officially announced. 

He has taken his campaign to the U.S. Congress and the U.N. General Assembly, but ultimately failed to block the agreement.

The deal puts strict limits on Iran's nuclear activities for at least a decade and calls for stringent U.N. oversight, with world powers hoping that this will make any dash to make an atomic bomb virtually impossible.

- 'Agreement is a tragedy' -

In return, painful international sanctions that have slashed the oil exports of OPEC's fifth-largest producer by a quarter and choked its economy will be lifted and billions of dollars in frozen assets unblocked.

"You can't prevent an agreement when those negotiating it are prepared to make more and more concessions to those shouting 'Death to the United States' even as the talks are in progress," Netanyahu said.

"Iran will get hundreds of billions of dollars with which it will be able to fuel its terror machine," he said, referring to the expected lifting of sanctions.

Defense Minister Moshe Yaalon accused the six powers that negotiated the deal -- Britain, France, the United States, Germany, China and Russia -- of needlessly caving in to Tehran.

"Iran, who arrived at the negotiating table in a weak position, has emerged victorious," he said. 

"Instead of fighting terror with all its might, the free world has granted legitimacy to Iran's hateful, murderous ways. This agreement is a tragedy for all who aspire for regional stability and fear a nuclear Iran."

Late on Monday, Netanyahu even opened a Persian-language Twitter account, @IsraeliPM_Farsi, to rail against the deal in the hope of convincing the Iranian public.

Opposition leader Isaac Herzog said on his Facebook page that "Israel's interests have been abandoned."

- 'Pyromaniac with matches' -

Science and technology minister Danny Danon said it was "not just bad for Israel, it's dangerous for the entire free world."

"Giving the world's largest supporter of terrorism a free pass in developing nuclear weapons is like providing a pyromaniac with matches," he said in a statement.

Deputy foreign minister Tzipi Hotovely called the deal "a capitulation of historic proportions to the Iran-led axis of evil."

"The implications of this agreement for the foreseeable future are very grave," she said.

"The state of Israel will employ all diplomatic means to prevent confirmation of the agreement."

In New York, World Jewish Congress president Ronald S. Lauder was more cautious.

"We are still looking forward to getting all the details of this agreement, with the hope that the verification process will allow inspectors to determine Iran's true aims," the WJC quoted him as saying.

"As the famous proverb goes, 'The road to hell is often paved with good intentions'."

Comments 10
Missing helicopter 14 July 2015, 19:37

You mean HA will do to Israel what it already did to Lebanon?

Missing helicopter 14 July 2015, 20:14

Countries never disappear, they only morph.
HA morphed Lebanon from a country partially occupied by Israel to a country partially controlled by Iran. HA's project is work in progress and Lebanon's absorption into welayat el faqih is the final goal.

Missing helicopter 15 July 2015, 00:05

Palestine did not disappear, it morphed into Israel which is exacctly why I fear for Lebanon to morph into one welayat under the el faqih or one part of IS.

Default-user-icon Zouhair (Guest) 14 July 2015, 19:56

Hey portugal listen well you and nasrallah your friend,not that i like the Zionist but just remember history ,remember abdulnaser,hafez assad,king hussein,saddam husein,and all other leaders ,they all wanted to destroy this nation ,but look clear they were all gone like dogs and the Zionist state still exist ,isnt strange ??? Well looks like this nation is blessed and nothing wat to do about it,nasrallah read history !!!!and save yourself to iran...the middle east will be always waja3 rass unfortenatly .

Default-user-icon Basem (Guest) 15 July 2015, 19:13

Portugal trust me and believe it the christians and the jews has the same destiniy and we ll see it in the near future.,back to the 80's i remember israel did everything possible to do a peace treaty with lebanon and they wanted to leave lebanon as soon as possible but we all know unfortenatly wat happenned after ...we see it very clear in the middle east ,these extremiste dont want any other religion beside the islam its crystal clear.

Missing phillipo 14 July 2015, 20:35

Southern - When exactly did Palestine disappear.
If you would care to check up in your history books you will find that there NEVER has been an independent Palestine State.
Until 1918 the area was part of the Ottoman Empire, then became a British League of Nations Mandate.
In November 1947 the UN voted to establish two states, an Arab one and a Jewish one. The Arabs refused to establish their state, so that is probably why you claim that Palestine disappeared.

Missing helicopter 15 July 2015, 03:06

Sorry phillipo I must take some exception to your statement (a moderate exception). The displacement of over 1 million people is wrong. The occupation of Jerusalem and the West Bank are wrong.
Also in the same logic you are using: When did Israel exist? After 1947?
and what happened to the two state solution the UN advocated (I think I know your reply to this one, which is the Arabs turned it down by launching the 1967 war, but who is turning it down NOW - The LIKUD and extreme right)
Palestine needs to be established and become the homeland to the displaced population.

Thumb beiruti 15 July 2015, 03:14

Of course, its a good deal. Netanyahu's ravings are only helping Rouhani and Khomanie to sell the deal to their Iranian hardliners. If Netanyhu is so against it, then it can't be all bad, is the sales pitch. A classic case of Brier Rabbit if ever I saw one.

And Israel will go it alone against Iran??? Not on your life!

Thumb beiruti 15 July 2015, 03:17

What does Netanyahu really fear about this agreement?? He fears that it will work. That Israel will lose its status as the only "strategic ally" the US has in the region. Iran is Israel's only competitor in that field and the rise of ISIS has made Iran more "strategic" than is Israel. Israel's fear is not annihilation but it is irrelevancy. It is a zero-sum game for them. To the extent that any other state establishes a relationship with the US, it diminishes the Israeli relationship and in Netanyahu's paranoia, this he cannot stand.

Thumb beiruti 15 July 2015, 03:18

So does Israel want it or not. From a strategic defense posture, it is good for Israel to have Iran under the tent with Israel's greatest friend in the world. But for that very reason, politically, it is a bad deal. Why? Because Israel's greatest regional rival is under the same tent with the US.