Majority Source to Hariri: U.S., Israel are Capable of Changing Indictment

إقرأ هذا الخبر بالعربية W460

A high-ranking source in the March 8 forces said that the majority agrees with former Premier Saad Hariri that it won’t be able to change anything in the indictment issued by the international tribunal.

But the source told As Safir daily on Wednesday that experience in the past six years showed that the U.S. and Israel are capable of changing the Special Tribunal for Lebanon’s accusations.

The reaction of the March 8 official came after ex-Premier Saad Hariri said on Tuesday night that no matter what “Hizbullah and its leader do, they won’t change a single word in the indictment.”

Premier Najib Miqati, who was attacked by Hariri in the interview with MTV, did not make any comment given that he was on the plane back to Beirut from his vacation.

His sources haven’t replied as well.

Hariri described the prime minister as Hizbullah’s surrogate and accused Miqati of betraying him.

Comments 20
Default-user-icon Miqato (Guest) 13 July 2011, 09:49

Miqati was elected on Harriri's name. He betrayed the voters and his friend for his own personal gain. There's no statesmanship here, he and safadi are traitors clear and simple.

Thumb thepatriot 13 July 2011, 10:03

Israel this, and USA that, oooooh that's enough now! We are tired of this good old lame excuse!

Default-user-icon justsayin (Guest) 13 July 2011, 10:20

@thepatriot is right, we have to show some openness to friendly neihhbors like israel, they clearly have no bad intentions

Thumb shab 13 July 2011, 10:40

Israel can change the weather, number of days in the week and even force Mehdi to rotate in the skies.

Default-user-icon Fardoussi (Guest) 13 July 2011, 12:48

No need to tell him this. He already used their services and still failed. Did anyone mention that he is an imbecile? If the leader is an imbecile, then what does this tell you about his sheep and goats, especially the Christian Sunnis among them?

Default-user-icon amirmansour (Guest) 13 July 2011, 13:16

Stop Blaming Israel and USA and others for internal deficiency and problems.
Israel might be blamed along with American for changing the hour, day, week, year into metric units of 10.
The leaders of the Arab world used Israel and USA as Anesthesia to create calm and fear in the Arabic Street.....
That is passed.
Think future and new.

Default-user-icon Le Phenicien (Guest) 13 July 2011, 14:55

Mowaten, you are a peasant!

Thumb thepatriot 13 July 2011, 15:26

@mowaten
You are the intellectually challenged primate who uses USA as an excuse for whatever problems you might have. As soon as you're cornered it is USA this, and Israel that!
Grow a brain for God sakes!

Missing peace 13 July 2011, 17:00

i punched a tire yesterday, i m sure it was part of a conspiracy led by israel and the usa so that i would be late at my apointment!

I burned a cake in the oven! i m sure the oven was US made so it was a conspiracy to ruin my dinner!

oh, there were clouds over the moon yesterday, kis ikht el israeli, they wanted to hide the moon!

too many traffic jams in beirut, it s part of a US israeli plot to slow down lebanese and ruin the economy!

ohhh! it s hot this summer, it s a US conspiracy !

even ahmedinejad said the USA were responsible for the draught in iran!!!
(and it s true, that the worst and most hilarious thing!)

Default-user-icon MUSTAPHA O. GHALAYINI (Guest) 13 July 2011, 18:57

i don't care about saado and najibullah,but the farsi finger in bilad el arz will be cut.
from bahrein to beirut the road to the mediterrenean is already shivering,just wait for bashar to withdraw body parts.

Missing mabboud 13 July 2011, 22:27

Does Israel have a Veto that it uses excessively in the UN to protect Israel.. Yes

Was Iraq invaded by martians... I guess not

Was the US who topled the Iranian gov in the 50s to impose the Sha (Obama recognized it finally)

Was Salvador Allende killed by HA to impose US hegemony on Chili... probably

Did Che Guevara die from natural cause

Was the US behind the Berlin discotheque affair, killing US soldiers to attack Libya... Mehlis did a gr8 job and tribunal in germany few years ago liberated the en-prisoned False Accused (like the false witnesses) for there was no conspiracy

Did the US helped Saddam take power.. no, and they never worked with him (conspiracy)

Was the USS liberty bombed by Israelis... no, conspiracy

Srebrenica was a huge massacre, genocide.... of course, US/NATO didn't manipulate the facts, there was Serbian concentration camps... people who say that there wasn't are just crazy conspiracy theorists including Chomsky!

Haiti Guatemala Venezuela Nicaragua

Missing mabboud 13 July 2011, 22:33

Sorry, in English we sah Chile, my mistake... the fact is that no matter what language you use, the list is huge.

Haiti was even invaded with US food sponsored by US gov. to kill agriculture, UN was used by the US to also help eliminate animal food (accused of having viruses) to starve even further Haiti.

Peple who still have a brain that can work, can search the web and will learn a lot... not talking about Sept 11 inside job but about well known reported stories and well accepted... make your own opinion!!

Thumb thepatriot 14 July 2011, 12:42

@mowaten
If the term "intellectually challenged primate" sounds THAT smart to you, then your case is even worse than I thought...

Thumb thepatriot 14 July 2011, 12:58

@ mabboud
There have been HUNDREDS (I think around two hundred) of wars all around the globe since WWII, and there has been thousands of assassinations as well. So sure, the USA has been involved in seval of them, and they are the only so called "super power". But this does not allow one to sistematically to blame them for every conspiracy that goes on in this world.
Israel has no veto power at the UN.
And always putting the blame on the USA is kind of the easy way really...

Missing mabboud 14 July 2011, 16:43

Pariot.. u r correct, it is USrael that has a veto (It should be US has veto to protect Israel.. you c, I don't c US everywhere but rather Israel :) ).

I was not making US responsible for all conspiracies, where did I say that; my point was that they are in several and as u stated, they are a super power, and thus, they r probably linked directly or indirectly to many of them.

My point was not to say that they are everywhere on all conspiracies but that yes, there r indeed many many conspiracies where they are.. u again are trying to distort what I say, this was as an answer that accusing US of being part of conspiracies is not always ridiculous.

That said, I didn't say that they are behind the killing of anyone but rather that they are great at conspiring; just read this document and tell me if they don't conspire at the security council for political assassinations not: http://www.ipsnews.net/news.asp?idnews=40649

Missing mabboud 14 July 2011, 16:46

For those who don't like to read much : http://www.ipsnews.net/news.asp?idnews=40649

Extract:

On Dec. 27, within hours of Bhutto's murder, the 15-member U.N. Security Council called an emergency meeting deploring her assassination and underlining the need to bring "perpetrators, organisers, financiers and sponsors" of the crime to justice.

But the fact that in its presidential statement, the Council described the fatal attack on Bhutto as "an act of terrorism" has raised many eyebrows, because it indirectly supports the Pakistan government, which in the eyes of Bhutto's Pakistan Peoples Party (PPP) is the prime suspect.

Critics say they are justified in asking the Council members how they knew that she was killed by "terrorists", and not the government she opposed. They also wonder why the Council hurried to adopt a presidential statement in the absence of any initial investigation. .......

Missing mabboud 14 July 2011, 16:48

A diplomatic source who was present at the meeting told IPS that the Council did not immediately agree because some members had disputed the wording of the presidential draft statement introduced by the United States.

Delegates from Belgium and Africa, according to the source, wanted to know why Bhutto's murder should be described as a terrorist act in the absence of any conclusive evidence.
But the U.S .envoy insisted that the cause of her death was a terrorist act and that its ally Pakistan would like to retain that wording in the text. At that point the Belgian delegate reportedly asked: "Why should Pakistan tell us what to do? It's not a member of the Council"

The final statement still reflected more concern about "terrorism" than the assassination of Bhutto. In fact, the word "terrorism" appears 10 times more than the name of the slain leader

Critics also wonder why the Council did not call for an international investigation into her murder as it did in the case of Hariri

Default-user-icon Ex- March 14 (Guest) 15 July 2011, 01:04

May God Bless Miqati!
May God Bless the Lebanese Army!
May God Bless the Lebanese resistance (M8)

Saad Hariri is an illeterate spoilt little brat that doesnt even deserve to hold a lebanese passport. Someone who sells his fathers blood for power does not deserve the respect of the great people of Lebanon.

Thumb thepatriot 15 July 2011, 10:55

@ex M14
I would be curious to know why you ever were with M14?

Thumb thepatriot 15 July 2011, 10:56

@mabboud
I am sorry but I do not see how this is related. Your example is not what I would call a conspiracy.